UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION



Washington, DC  20549



FORM 10-K



[X] Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934



For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016



[   ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Commission File Number

001-09071



BBX Capital Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)













Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None.



Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:





Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.YES [  ]  NO [X]



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  YES [  ]  NO [X]



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES [X]  NO [  ]



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X]  No [  ]



Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   [X]

---

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer   [  ]Accelerated filer [X]Non-accelerated filer [  ]    Smaller reporting company [  ]



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).YES [  ]  NO [X]

On June 30, 2016, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting common equity held by non-affiliates was $140.0 million computed by reference to the closing price of the registrant’s Class A Common Stock on such date. The registrant does not have any non-voting common equity.



The number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock as of March 7, 2017 is as follows:



 

Class A Common Stock of $.01 par value, 85,765,452 shares outstanding.
Class B Common Stock of $.01 par value, 16,759,009 shares outstanding.



Documents Incorporated by Reference



Portions of the registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A relating to the registrant’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.





 

---

 





  

 

---

 





PART I





Item 1.  BUSINESS



Overview



History



On December 15, 2016, the Company completed the acquisition of all the outstanding shares of the former BBX Capital Corporation (“BCC”) not previously owned by the Company and following the transaction the Company changed its name from BFC Financial Corporation to BBX Capital Corporation. The acquisition was consummated by the merger of BCC into a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, BBX Merger Sub, LLC.  As a consequence of the merger, BCC is now a wholly owned subsidiary of BBX Capital.  The merger is described in further detail in Item 8 – Note 3 of this report.



Prior to the acquisition of all the outstanding shares of BCC, the Company had an 82% equity interest in BCC and a direct 54% equity interest in Woodbridge, the parent company of Bluegreen Corporation.  BCC held the remaining 46% interest in Woodbridge. Woodbridge became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company as a result of the acquisition of all the outstanding shares of BCC by the Company.



BCC’s principal asset until July 31, 2012 was its ownership of BankAtlantic and its subsidiaries (“BankAtlantic”).  BankAtlantic was a federal savings bank headquartered in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.  On July 31, 2012, BCC completed the sale to BB&T Corporation (“BB&T”) of all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of BankAtlantic (the stock sale and related transactions described herein are collectively referred to as the “BankAtlantic Sale” or the “BB&T Transaction”).  Prior to the closing of the BB&T Transaction, BankAtlantic formed two wholly-owned subsidiaries, BBX Capital Asset Management, LLC (“CAM”) and Florida Asset Resolution Group, LLC (“FAR”) and transferred certain non-performing commercial loans, commercial real estate and previously written-off assets to the two wholly owned subsidiaries as described in further detail in Item 8 – Note 1 of this report.



BBX Capital Corporation



BBX Capital Corporation (formerly BFC Financial Corporation) is referred to in this report together with its subsidiaries as “the Company” “we”, “us”, or “our” and is referred to in this report without its subsidiaries as “BBX Capital”. BBX Capital is a Florida-based diversified holding company with investments in Bluegreen Corporation (“Bluegreen”), and in real estate and middle market operating companies.









Our Strategies and Objectives



Our objective is to increase shareholder value through investments in diverse industries. In recent years, the Company has focused on providing strategic support to its existing investments with a view to the improved performance of the organization as a whole. Additionally, we have and may in the future invest in operating businesses and in real estate developments and joint ventures for the development of residential and commercial real estate projects, including those in which our affiliates may participate.  The Company’s investments or acquisitions, and the business and investment strategies of the Company’s subsidiaries, may not prove to be successful or even if successful may not initially generate income or may generate income on an irregular basis, and may involve a long term investment. The Company expects to continue to experience losses in its Middle Market Division with an anticipated goal of building long term value.  As a consequence, the Company’s results of operations may vary significantly on a quarterly basis.



The Company’s goal is to build long-term value rather than focus on quarterly or annual earnings.  While capital markets generally encourage short term results, the Company’s objective continues to be long term growth as measured by increases in book value and intrinsic value over time.



The Company may also consider transactions involving the sale of all or a portion of its assets, investments or subsidiaries, including transactions involving Bluegreen.  These may include, among other alternatives, a future sale or spin-off or transactions involving public or private issuances of debt or equity securities which might decrease or dilute the Company’s ownership interest.  See also, “Part II-Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”





Additional Information



The Company’s corporate website is www.bbxcapital.com. The Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports, are available free of charge through its website, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. The Company’s website and the information contained on or connected to it are not incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



This document contains forward-looking statements based largely on current expectations of the Company that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. All opinions, forecasts, projections, future plans or other statements, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements and can be identified by the use of words or phrases such as “plans,” “believes,” “will,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “estimates,” “our view,” “we see,” “would” and words and phrases of similar import. The forward looking statements in this document are also forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and involve substantial risks and uncertainties. We can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct. Actual results, performance, or achievements could differ materially from those contemplated, expressed, or implied by the forward-looking statements contained herein. Forward-looking statements are based largely on our expectations and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that are subject to change based on factors which are, in many instances, beyond our control. When considering forward-looking statements, the reader should keep in mind the risks, uncertainties and other cautionary statements made in this report. The reader should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement, which speaks only as of the date made. This document also contains information regarding the past performance of the Company, its subsidiaries and their respective investments and operations, and the reader should note that prior or current performance is not a guarantee or indication of future performance. Future results could differ materially as a result of a variety of risks and uncertainties.



Some factors which may affect the accuracy of the forward-looking statements apply generally to the industries in which the Company operates, including the real estate development and construction industry in which BBX Capital Real Estate operates, the resort development and vacation ownership industries in which Bluegreen operates, the home improvement industry in which Renin operates and the sugar and confection industry in which BBX Sweet Holdings operates. 

---

 



These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:

 



With respect to Bluegreen, the risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:



---

 



With respect to BBX Capital Real Estate activities, the risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:





---

 

With respect to the Company’s Middle Market activities, the risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:





In addition to the risks and factors identified above, reference is also made to the other risks and factors detailed in this report and the other reports filed by the Company with the SEC, including those disclosed in the “Risk Factors” section of this report. The Company cautions that the foregoing factors are not exclusive.





Divisions



The Company currently operates through three divisions: Bluegreen, BBX Capital Real Estate and Middle Market.    



Bluegreen



Overview



Bluegreen Corporation (“Bluegreen”) is a sales, marketing, and management company focused on the vacation ownership industry.  Bluegreen markets, sells and manages VOIs in resorts, which are generally located in popular, high-volume, “drive-to” vacation destinations.  The resorts in which Bluegreen markets, sells or manages VOIs were either developed or acquired by Bluegreen, or were developed and owned by third parties.  Bluegreen earns fees for providing sales and marketing services to third party developers.  Bluegreen also earns fees by providing management services to the Bluegreen Vacation Club and POAs, mortgage servicing, VOI title services, reservation services, and construction design and development services.  In addition, Bluegreen provides financing to FICO® score-qualified individual purchasers of VOIs, which generates significant interest income.



Strategies



The Company’s strategy to grow Bluegreen’s profitability and long-term value is focused on:





Industry Overview



The resorts component of the leisure industry has historically been serviced primarily by two separate alternatives for overnight accommodations: commercial lodging establishments and vacation ownership resorts. Commercial lodging consists principally of hotels and motels in which a room is rented on a nightly, weekly or monthly basis, or rentals of privately-owned condominium units or homes through both traditional methods of delivery as well as new web portals and applications.  Bluegreen believes that vacation ownership presents an attractive vacation alternative to commercial lodging particularly for families.    

---

 



Vacation ownership interests were first introduced in Europe in the mid 1960s. Initially, the vacation ownership industry was highly fragmented, with a large number of local and regional resort developers and operators having small resort portfolios generally of differing quality.  Bluegreen believes that one of the most significant factors contributing to the growth of the vacation ownership industry was the entry into the market of some of the world’s major lodging, hospitality and entertainment companies, such as Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation (formerly part of Marriott Hotels), the Walt Disney Company, Hilton Grand Vacations Company (“Hilton”, formerly part of Hilton Hotels Corporation), Vistana Signature Experiences (formerly part of Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide, Inc.), and Wyndham Worldwide Corporation (“Wyndham”).  Although vacation ownership operations in some cases comprise only a portion of these companies’ overall operations, Bluegreen believes that their involvement in the vacation ownership industry has enhanced the industry’s image with the general public.



The purchase of a timeshare property typically entitles the buyer to use and occupy a fully-furnished residence, generally for a stated period or in perpetuity. Typically, the buyer acquires an ownership interest in the vacation residence, which is often held as a tenant-in-common with other buyers of interests in the vacation residence. However, under a points-based vacation club system, such as the Bluegreen Vacation Club, the members purchase a real estate interest in a specific VOI resort, which is deeded on their behalf into a trust and provides the member with beneficial rights, including an annual or biennial allotment of points that can be used to reserve occupancy at participating resorts. See “Products and Services – Vacation Ownership” below for additional information regarding the Bluegreen Vacation Club and Bluegreen’s points-based system.



Bluegreen believes that, in general, the desire exists to take family vacations and that the Bluegreen Vacation Club is positioned to benefit from consumer demand for family vacations.  However, economic conditions and other factors may have an adverse effect on the demand for vacations, the vacation ownership industry specifically, and Bluegreen’s operations.



Products and Services



Vacation Ownership



Bluegreen has been involved in the vacation ownership industry since 1994.  Since Bluegreen’s inception, Bluegreen has generated approximately 582,000 VOI sales transactions, which include over 99,000 VOI sales transactions on behalf of third-parties.  As of December 31, 2016, Bluegreen was selling VOIs in the Bluegreen Vacation Club at 23 sales offices at resorts located in the United States.  VOIs in Bluegreen resorts and those sold by Bluegreen on behalf of third parties typically entitle the buyer to use resort accommodations through an annual or biennial allotment of “points” which represent the buyer’s ownership and beneficial use rights in perpetuity in the Bluegreen Vacation Club (supported by an underlying deeded VOI held in trust for the buyer).  Bluegreen believes the Bluegreen Vacation Club allows its VOI owners to customize their vacation experience in a more flexible manner than traditional fixed-week vacation ownership programs.  Members can use their points to stay in resorts for varying lengths of time starting at a minimum of two nights.  The number of points required for a stay at a resort varies depending on a variety of factors, including the resort location, the size of a unit, the vacation season and the days of the week used.    Under this system, members can select vacations among available resorts according to their schedules, space needs, and available points.  Subject to certain restrictions and fees, members are typically allowed to carry over for one year any unused points and to "borrow" points from the next year.  Bluegreen Vacation Club members may use their points to stay in any of the 66 Bluegreen Vacation Club resorts.  Bluegreen Vacation Club members may also use their points to take advantage of other vacation options, including an exchange program offered by a third-party world-wide vacation ownership exchange network of approximately 4,300 resorts and other vacation experiences such as cruises and hotel stays.  Additionally, through an alliance with Choice Hotels International, Inc. ( “Choice Hotels”), Bluegreen Vacation Club members may enroll in Choice Hotels’ free rewards program, Choice Privileges®.  For a fee, Bluegreen Vacation Club members can convert their Bluegreen Vacation Club points into Choice Privileges® points, which can be used for free nights at Choice hotel locations and other rewards such as gift cards.  Additionally, for a fee, members of the Bluegreen Traveler Plus™ program may use their Bluegreen Vacation Club points for stays in Choice Hotels’ Ascend Hotel Collection® properties, a network of historic and boutique hotels in the United States, Canada, Scandinavia and Latin America, subject to the terms and conditions of the program.  See “VOI Exchange Networks, the Bluegreen Traveler Plus™ Program and Other Strategic Alliances” for additional information regarding vacation options available to Bluegreen Vacation Club members in addition to Bluegreen Vacation Club resorts.



The owners of VOIs collectively manage the resort property through nonprofit POAs that are governed by a board of directors or trustees, consisting of representatives of the developer (so long as the developer owns VOIs in the resort or as otherwise provided by law) and owners of VOIs at the resort.  The board of directors hires a management company to which it delegates many of the rights and responsibilities of the POA, including grounds landscaping, security, housekeeping and operating supplies, garbage collection, utilities, insurance procurement, laundry and repairs and

---

 

maintenance. Each VOI owner is required to pay a share of the costs of maintaining all of the properties in the Bluegreen Vacation Club system. These charges generally consist of an annual maintenance fee plus applicable real estate taxes and special assessments, which are assessed on an as-needed basis.  If a VOI owner does not pay such charges, the owner’s use rights may be suspended and ultimately terminated, subject to the lender’s first mortgage lien on the VOI, if any.



Capital-Light Business Strategy



In addition to Bluegreen’s traditional vacation ownership operations, Bluegreen has in recent years pursued a business strategy, referred to herein as the “capital-light” business strategy, involving activities that typically do not require the significant costs and capital investments generally associated with the acquisition and development of VOIs under Bluegreen’s traditional vacation ownership business.  Bluegreen believes its capital-light business strategy enables it to utilize its expertise and existing infrastructure in resort management, sales and marketing, mortgage servicing, title services, and construction management to generate recurring revenues from third parties.  As of December 31, 2016, Bluegreen’s capital-light business activities consisted of fee-based sales and marketing arrangements; just-in-time inventory acquisition arrangements; secondary market arrangements; and other fee-based services.  Each of these categories is described below.  



Fee-Based Sales and Marketing Arrangements 



Bluegreen offers sales and marketing services to third-party developers for a fee.  Under these arrangements, Bluegreen sells third-party VOIs as Bluegreen Vacation Club interests through its distribution network of sales offices, typically on a non-committed basis.  Bluegreen seeks to structure its fee for these services to cover its selling and marketing costs, plus an operating profit.  Because the completed VOI was built by a third-party, Bluegreen is not at risk for the development financing of these projects and Bluegreen has little to no capital requirements.  However, these activities subject Bluegreen to the risks of third-party developers of resorts under fee-based sales and marketing arrangements do not deliver the resorts’ VOIs as planned, or do not fulfill their obligation to Bluegreen or to the POAs that maintain the resorts they develop.  Notes receivable originated in connection with Bluegreen’s sale of third party VOIs under commission-based arrangements are held by the third party developer, and in certain cases are serviced by Bluegreen for a fee.  Bluegreen refers to sales made on behalf of third-party developers as “FBS Sales”.



Just-In-Time Inventory Acquisition Arrangements



Bluegreen enters into agreements with third-party developers that allow Bluegreen to buy VOI inventory from time to time in close proximity to the timing of when Bluegreen intends to sell such VOIs.  Bluegreen’s goal is to enter into such arrangements on a non-committed basis, although Bluegreen may engage in committed arrangements under certain circumstances.  Because the completed VOI was owned by a third-party, Bluegreen is not at risk for the development financing of these projects.  However, Bluegreen is at risk if the third-party developers of resorts under fee-based sales and marketing arrangements do not deliver the resorts’ VOIs as planned, or do not fulfill their obligation to Bluegreen or to the POAs that maintain the resorts they develop.  Unlike FBS Sales, receivables originated in connection with sales of just-in-time inventory are held by Bluegreen.  Sales of inventory acquired through these arrangements are sometimes referred to as “Just-In-Time Sales”.



Secondary Market Arrangements



Bluegreen acquires VOI inventory from POAs and other third parties on a non-committed basis, in close proximity to the timing of when Bluegreen intends to sell such VOIs.  Such VOIs are typically obtained by the POAs through foreclosure in connection with maintenance fee defaults, and are generally acquired by Bluegreen at a significant discount.  Sales of inventory acquired through these arrangements are sometimes referred to as “Secondary Market Sales”.



---

 

Other Fee-Based Services



Bluegreen also earns fees for providing management services to the Bluegreen Vacation Club and to certain POAs.  In connection with the management services provided to the Bluegreen Vacation Club, Bluegreen manages the club reservation system and provides owner services as well as billing and collection services.  In connection with Bluegreen’s management of POAs, Bluegreen provides day-to-day management services, including contracting for housekeeping services, maintenance, and certain accounting and administrative services.  As of December 31, 2016, Bluegreen provided management services to 47 timeshare resort properties and hotels.  Other fee-based services also include the processing of sales of VOIs through Bluegreen’s wholly-owned title company subsidiary, which earns fees in connection with the closing of the VOI transactions.  Bluegreen also generates fee-based income by providing construction, design and management services, and mortgage servicing.



Bluegreen has over the last several years increased the activities associated with its capital-light business strategy; however, Bluegreen’s efforts to continue to execute its capital-light business strategy may not be successful, and any arrangements entered into may not prove to be profitable.  Further, changes in economic conditions may adversely impact the results of Bluegreen’s fee-based and other capital-light business activities and may make the capital-light business strategy less attractive going forward.



Vacation Club Resort Locations

Bluegreen Vacation Club resorts are primarily “drive-to” resort destinations. Bluegreen believes that 85% of its VOI owners live within a 4 hour drive of at least one of its resorts. Units at most of the Bluegreen Vacation Club resorts typically include a full kitchen, two televisions, and laundry facilities. Many resorts offer guests a clubhouse (with an indoor or outdoor pool, a game room, exercise facilities and a lounge) and hotel-type staff.  Bluegreen manages certain of the resorts either directly or through a subcontract.



The following table lists the Bluegreen Vacation Club resorts:







Future Resorts and Acquisition of Additional Inventory



Bluegreen believes that it currently has adequate timeshare inventory on hand, or available for sale through arrangements with third parties in connection with its capital-light business strategy, to satisfy its projected sales of VOIs for 2017 and a number of years thereafter.  However, Bluegreen may decide to acquire or develop inventory in the future.  It is also expected that development activities will continue at resorts developed by Bluegreen/Big Cedar Vacations and other Bluegreen sites on a limited basis.



---

 

VOI Exchange Networks, the Bluegreen Traveler Plus™ Program, and Other Strategic Alliances



Bluegreen believes that its VOIs are made more attractive by its alliance with Choice Hotels, its participation in third-party exchange networks, its Traveler Plus™ program and other strategic affiliations with third-party resort developers.  In 2013, Bluegreen entered into a five-year strategic alliance agreement with Choice Hotels.  Choice Hotels currently franchises approximately 6,400 hotels in more than 40 countries and territories and its brands include the Ascend Hotel Collection®, Comfort Inn®, Comfort Suites®, Quality®, Sleep Inn®, Clarion®, Cambria® hotels and suites, MainStay Suites®, Suburban Extended Stay Hotel®, Econo Lodge® and Rodeway Inn®.  Bluegreen’s relationship with Choice Hotels’ impacts several areas of Bluegreen’s business and, while there is no assurance as to the success of the relationship, it includes a sales and marketing alliance component that Bluegreen believes enables it to leverage Choice Hotels’ brands, customer relationships and marketing channels to market Bluegreen’s VOI offerings.  Additionally, subject to the terms and conditions of the agreements, including specified payments to Choice Hotels, Bluegreen Vacation Club resorts may be branded as part of the Ascend Hotel Collection®.  As of December 31, 2016, a total of 29 Bluegreen Vacation Club resorts were branded as part of the Ascend Hotel Collection®.  Also, Bluegreen Vacation Club members may enroll as members of the Choice Hotels loyalty program, Choice Privileges®, and for a fee can convert their Bluegreen Vacation Club points into Choice Privileges® points which can be used for stays at participating Choice Hotels.  Additionally, for a fee, members of the Bluegreen Traveler Plus™ program may exchange their vacation points for stays at Choice Hotels’ Ascend Hotel Collection® properties subject to the terms and conditions of the program.



Bluegreen Vacation Club members may also participate in an unaffiliated external exchange network, Resort Condominiums International, LLC (“RCI”).  The RCI exchange network allows an owner to exchange stays in their VOI for occupancy at nearly 4,300 participating resorts located throughout the world in more than 100 countries, based upon availability and the payment of a variable exchange fee.  The annual membership fees of RCI are included in the Bluegreen Vacation Club dues.  In 2016, approximately 9% of Bluegreen Vacation Club members utilized the RCI exchange network for an exchange of two or more nights.  Most of the Bluegreen Vacation Club resorts are rated in one of the two highest categories by RCI (Gold Crown and Silver Crown).  



Bluegreen Vacation Club members, for an additional annual fee, may also participate in the Bluegreen Traveler Plus™ program, which allows them to use their points for a variety of hotel stays, RV site stays within the “Coast to Coast” network, or various cruise vacations.  Also, for a nominal fee, Bluegreen Vacation Club members who purchased or upgraded their VOI since July 1, 2007 and participate in the Bluegreen Traveler Plus™ program have the ability to use their vacation points to reserve accommodations in 43 additional resort locations through Bluegreen’s alliances with other resort development companies (“Direct Exchange”).



No assurance can be given that Bluegreen’s resorts will continue to participate in the RCI or Direct Exchange networks, or that Bluegreen’s customers will continue to be satisfied with these networks or the Bluegreen Traveler Plus™ program.  In addition, Bluegreen’s relationship with Choice Hotels may not be received favorably by Choice’s or Bluegreen’s customers and may not have a positive impact on Bluegreen’s operating results or financial condition.  If Bluegreen does not continue to participate in qualified exchange networks or maintain other strategic alliances, including if Bluegreen’s resorts are not included in such networks or alliances, or if such networks or other strategic alliances do not operate effectively, Bluegreen’s financial condition, results and business could be materially adversely affected.



Marketing and Sale of Inventory



Bluegreen uses a variety of methods to attract prospective purchasers of VOIs, including selling discount vacation packages either face-to-face or through telemarketing efforts to consumers Bluegreen meets in connection with various marketing alliances (as discussed in greater detail below) and other arrangements, and referrals of prospective purchasers from existing VOI owners.  Bluegreen sometimes provides hotel accommodations or accommodations in one of Bluegreen’s resorts to prospective purchasers at reduced rates in exchange for their touring one of Bluegreen’s resorts.



Additionally, Bluegreen offers a sampler program which allows purchasers of this product to enjoy substantially the same accommodations offered to Bluegreen Vacation Club members during a trial period, which is generally one or two years.  Bluegreen believes that it benefits from the sampler program as it gives Bluegreen an opportunity to market its VOIs to customers when they use their trial memberships at a Bluegreen resort and to recapture a portion of the costs incurred in connection with the initial marketing to prospective customers.



In addition to attracting new customers, Bluegreen seeks to sell VOIs to its existing VOI owners (“owner sales”).  Owner sales generally have lower marketing costs and typically result in relatively higher operating margins than sales generated through other marketing channels.  During 2016, owner sales accounted for 46% of Bluegreen’s system-

---

 

wide sales.  However, Bluegreen has recently increased, and expects to continue to increase, its marketing efforts to new customers as compared to existing owners as it believes that its ability to continue to sell VOIs to its current existing owner base could diminish over time without continued sales to new customers.  Accordingly, Bluegreen expects that its marketing expenses may increase in the future.



Bluegreen uses both “permission” marketing and branding programs.  “Permission” marketing methods involve obtaining the prospective purchasers’ permission, directly or indirectly, to contact them in the future regarding an offer to purchase a product or service.  Branding involves forming alliances with third-party entities that possess what Bluegreen believes to be a nationally or regionally known brand name, a good reputation and a customer base with similar demographic characteristics to Bluegreen’s target market.



One of Bluegreen’s wholly-owned subsidiaries has an arrangement with Big Cedar, LLC (“Big Cedar”), an affiliate of Bass Pro, Inc. (“Bass Pro”), pursuant to which, Bluegreen’s subsidiary owns 51% of Bluegreen/Big Cedar Vacations and Big Cedar owns the remaining 49%.  Bluegreen/Big Cedar Vacations develops, markets, and sells VOIs at the Bluegreen Wilderness Club at Big Cedar, a wilderness-themed resort adjacent to the Big Cedar Lodge, a luxury hotel resort owned by Big Cedar, on the shores of Table Rock Lake in Ridgedale, Missouri.  Bluegreen/Big Cedar Vacations also develops, markets, and sells timeshare interests in The Cliffs at Long Creek and Paradise Point Resort.  Bluegreen/Big Cedar Vacations pays Big Cedar a fee upon sales of certain timeshare interests for promotional, marketing and advertising services.



Bluegreen also has an exclusive marketing agreement with Bass Pro, a privately-held retailer of fishing, marine, hunting, camping and sports gear.  Pursuant to the agreement, Bluegreen has the right to market VOIs at each of Bass Pro’s retail locations.  As of December 31, 2016, Bluegreen marketed VOIs in 68 of Bass Pro’s stores.  These marketing efforts include offers for the sale of discounted vacation packages which require the purchaser to attend a timeshare sales presentation, where permitted by law.  Under the agreement, Bluegreen also has the right to market VOIs in Bass Pro’s catalogs and on its website, and Bluegreen has access to Bass Pro’s customer lists.  In exchange, Bluegreen compensates Bass Pro based on the overall success of these marketing activities.  The amount of compensation is dependent on the level of additional marketing efforts required by Bluegreen to convert the prospect into a sale and a defined time frame for such marketing efforts.  No compensation is paid to Bass Pro under the marketing agreement on sales made by Bluegreen/Big Cedar Vacations of VOIs owned by Bluegreen/Big Cedar Vacations.  In accordance with the agreement, Bluegreen makes an annual prepayment to Big Cedar by February of each year.  The prepayment is an advance payment for anticipated commissions estimated to be generated during the upcoming year, as determined by Bluegreen and Big Cedar, not to exceed $5.0 million.  No additional commissions are paid to Big Cedar during any year until the annual prepayment for that year has been fully earned.  During 2016, sales of VOIs to prospects and leads generated by the marketing arrangement with Bass Pro accounted for approximately 16% of Bluegreen’s VOI sales volume.  Bluegreen’s marketing agreement with Bass Pro is for a term expiring in January 2025, subject to early termination in whole or in part under certain circumstances.  There is no assurance that Bluegreen will be able to maintain, extend or renew its marketing relationship with Bass Pro, and Bluegreen’s sales would be materially and adversely impacted if Bluegreen’s relationship with Bass Pro ended.



As previously described, Bluegreen entered into a five-year strategic relationship with Choice Hotels in 2013.  This relationship impacts several areas of Bluegreen’s business and, while there is no assurance as to the success of the relationship, it includes a sales and marketing alliance component which Bluegreen believes enables Bluegreen to leverage Choice Hotels’ brands, customer relationships and marketing channels to market Bluegreen’s VOI offerings.  Choice Hotels’ obligations under the agreements are subject to Bluegreen making specified payments to Choice Hotels and certain other terms and conditions.



Typically, Bluegreen’s sales offices are located adjacent to certain of its resorts and are staffed with sales representatives and sales managers, all of whom are Bluegreen employees.  Bluegreen sponsors ongoing training for its personnel.



It is Bluegreen’s policy to require its sales staff to provide each VOI customer with a written disclosure statement prior to the time the customer signs a purchase agreement.  The purpose of this disclosure statement is to provide relevant information regarding VOI ownership at the resort and membership in the Bluegreen Vacation Club.  Pursuant to Bluegreen’s policies, the statement must be signed by every purchaser.  Purchasers are entitled to cancel purchase agreements within applicable legal rescission periods.  Substantially all VOI purchasers visit one of Bluegreen’s sales offices prior to or at the time of purchase.



Customer Financing



Bluegreen generally offers financing of up to 90% of the purchase price of its VOIs to its VOI customers who meet certain FICO® score-based underwriting standards.  The typical financing extended by Bluegreen on a VOI during

---

 

2016 provided for a term of 10 years and a fixed interest rate.  However, Bluegreen also encourages purchasers to finance their purchase with a loan having a shorter term by offering a lower interest rate on those loans.  In connection with Bluegreen VOI sales, Bluegreen delivers the property deed to the trustee of the Bluegreen Vacation Club on behalf of the purchaser and obtains a mortgage on the purchaser’s VOI.



Purchasers of VOIs are generally required to make a down payment of at least 10% of the VOI sales price.  As part of Bluegreen’s continued efforts to improve its operating cash flows, Bluegreen incentivizes its sales associates to encourage cash sales, and Bluegreen promotes a point-of-sale credit card program sponsored by a third party financial institution.  As a result of such efforts, Bluegreen has increased both the percentage of its sales that are 100% cash and its average down payment on financed sales.  Including down payments received on financed sales, approximately 41% of Bluegreen VOI sales during 2016 were paid in cash within approximately 30 days from the contract date.



See “Products and Services — Vacation Ownership” above for more information about the demographic profile of Bluegreen’s typical customer.  See “Sales of Receivables/Pledging of Receivables” below for information regarding Bluegreen’s receivable financing activities.



Loan Underwriting



Prior to December 15, 2008, Bluegreen’s VOI financing was not subject to any significant loan underwriting criteria and no FICO® score was obtained prior to extending credit.  Instead, customer financing on sales of VOIs typically only required the following: (i) receipt of a minimum down payment of 10% of the purchase price; (ii) a note and mortgage (or deed of trust); and (iii) other closing documents by the purchaser and Bluegreen.



Effective December 15, 2008, Bluegreen implemented a FICO® score-based credit underwriting program.  Following implementation, subject to certain limited exceptions, Bluegreen no longer provided financing to customers with FICO® scores below 500, and new customers with FICO® scores between 500 and 599 were required to make a minimum cash down payment of 20%.  Effective January 1, 2010, subject to certain limited exceptions, Bluegreen further increased its FICO® score-based credit underwriting standards such that Bluegreen no longer originates financing to customers with FICO® scores below 575 subject to certain limited exceptions. However, Bluegreen may, from time to time, offer certain introductory products to customers with different FICO®  scores, finance and down payment terms that it intends to hold in its portfolio.  Additionally, Bluegreen may provide financing to customers with no FICO®  scores if the customer makes a minimum required down payment.  For loans with an outstanding balance as of December 31, 2016 that were originated from December 15, 2008 through December 31, 2009, the borrowers’ weighted average FICO® score at the point of sale was 700.  For loans with an outstanding balance as of December 31, 2016 that were originated from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2016, the borrowers’ weighted average FICO® score at the point of sale was 706.  Further information is set forth in the following table:











Bluegreen encourages purchasers to make higher down payments and accept shorter loan period terms by offering lower interest rates.  Bluegreen may also from time to time offer lower rates for purchasers with specific FICO® scores or purchasers of higher volume point packages.  In addition, where permitted under applicable laws, rules and regulations, purchasers may receive a 1% discount in the interest rate by participating in Bluegreen’s pre-authorized payment plan.  As of December 31, 2016, borrowers with respect to approximately 95% of Bluegreen’s serviced VOI notes receivable participated in Bluegreen’s pre-authorized payment plan.



---

 

Effective November 1, 2008, Bluegreen increased the interest rates charged on new loans.  The weighted-average interest rate on Bluegreen’s VOI notes receivable was as follows:



Collection Policies



Financed sales of VOIs originated by Bluegreen typically utilize a note and mortgage.  Collection efforts related to the timeshare loans are managed by Bluegreen and are handled by a staff of collectors, assisted by a mortgage collection computer system.  Bluegreen’s collectors are incentivized through a performance-based compensation program.  Technological capabilities include, but are not limited to, automated lock box and clearing house processing.



Bluegreen generally makes collection efforts to customers by mail and by telephone.  Telephone contact generally commences when an account is as few as 10 days past due.  At 30 days past due, a collection letter is sent to U.S. residents advising the customer that if the loan is not brought current, the delinquency will be reported to the credit reporting agencies.  At 60 days delinquent, Bluegreen sends a letter to the customer by mail advising that they may be prohibited from making any future reservations for lodging at a resort.  If the delinquency continues, at 90 days past due, Bluegreen stops the accrual of, and reverses previously accrued but unpaid, interest on the note receivable and mails a “Notice of Intent to Cancel Membership,” which informs the customer that unless the delinquency is cured within 30 days, Bluegreen will terminate the customer’s VOI ownership.  If the customer fails to respond to such correspondence within the given timeframe, the loan will be defaulted and the customer’s VOI terminated.  In that case, Bluegreen sends a final letter, typically at approximately 120 days delinquent, to notify the customer of the loan default and the termination of the customer’s beneficial interest in the VOI property.  Thereafter, Bluegreen seeks to resell the VOI to a new purchaser.  Historically, Bluegreen has typically not sought to collect a deficiency on defaulted notes.



Recently, Bluegreen’s collection efforts have been increasingly impacted by the receipt of cease and desist letters from attorneys purporting to represent certain VOI owners and have encouraged such owners to become delinquent and ultimately default on obligations.  Following receipt, contact of VOI owners is ceased, unless otherwise allowed by law.



Allowance for Credit Losses



Under timeshare accounting rules, Bluegreen estimates uncollectibles based on historical uncollectibles for similar VOI notes receivable and does not consider the value of the underlying collateral.  Bluegreen holds large amounts of homogeneous VOI notes receivable and assesses uncollectibility based on pools of receivables.  In estimating future credit losses, Bluegreen does not use a single primary indicator of credit quality but instead evaluates its VOI notes receivable based upon a combination of factors, including a static pool analysis, the aging of the respective receivables, current default trends and prepayment rates by origination year, as well as the FICO® scores of the borrowers.



Substantially all defaulted VOI notes receivable result in the holder of the note receivable acquiring the related VOI that secured the note receivable, typically soon after default and at little or no cost.  The reacquired VOI is then available for resale in the normal course of business.



See “Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for additional information about the performance of Bluegreen’s notes receivable portfolio.



Sales of Receivables/Pledging of Receivables



Bluegreen’s ability to sell or borrow against its VOI notes receivable has historically been a critical factor in Bluegreen meeting its liquidity requirements.  The vacation ownership business generally involves making sales of a vacation product where a buyer is only required to pay a minimum of 10% to 20% of the purchase price up front, while at the same time selling and marketing expenses are primarily cash expenses exceeding the down payment amount.  For the year ended December 31, 2016, Bluegreen’s sales and marketing expenses were approximately 52% of its system-wide sales.  Accordingly, having facilities for the sale or hypothecation of these VOI notes receivables,

---

 

along with periodic term securitization transactions, has been a critical factor for Bluegreen in meeting its short- and long-term cash needs.



Bluegreen’s VOI receivables purchase facilities and term securitizations typically utilize an owner’s trust structure whereby Bluegreen sells receivables to a wholly-owned, special purpose finance entity which then sells the receivables to an owner’s trust, typically without recourse to Bluegreen or its subsidiaries, except for breaches of certain representations and warranties at the time of sale.  While in limited instances Bluegreen has entered into guarantees in connection with its vacation ownership receivables purchase facilities or term securitizations, historically, Bluegreen has typically not entered into such guarantees.  These facilities usually have detailed requirements with respect to the eligibility of receivables for purchase, and fundings under these facilities are typically subject to certain conditions precedent.  Under such purchase facilities, a variable purchase price of a portion of the principal balance of the receivables sold, subject to certain terms and conditions, is paid at closing in cash.  The balance of the purchase price is deferred until such time as the facility purchaser has received a specified return and all servicing, custodial, agent and similar fees and expenses have been paid and, if applicable, a specified overcollateralization ratio is achieved and a cash reserve account is fully funded.  Bluegreen’s VOI receivables purchase facilities typically include various conditions to purchase, covenants, triggering events and other provisions Bluegreen believes to be customary for these types of transactions.  Bluegreen has historically acted as servicer of, and in such capacity received a fee for servicing, the VOI receivables Bluegreen has sold under these purchase facilities.  See “Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for additional information about Bluegreen’s VOI receivables purchase facilities and term securitizations.



Receivables Servicing



Receivables servicing includes collecting payments from borrowers and remitting the funds to the owners, lenders or investors in such receivables, accounting for principal and interest on such receivables, making advances when required, contacting delinquent borrowers, terminating a membership in the Bluegreen Vacation Club in the event that defaults are not timely remedied, and performing other administrative duties.



Bluegreen receives mortgage servicing fees for servicing its securitized notes receivable which are included as a component of interest income.  Additionally, Bluegreen earns servicing fee income from third-party developers in connection with Bluegreen’s servicing of their loan portfolios under certain of Bluegreen’s fee-based services arrangements. 



Market and Industry Data



Market and industry data used throughout this report were obtained from Bluegreen’s internal surveys, industry publications, unpublished industry data and estimates, discussions with industry sources and other currently available information.  The sources for this data include, without limitation, the American Resort Development Association.  Industry publications generally state that the information contained therein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but there can be no assurance as to the accuracy and completeness of such information.  Bluegreen has not independently verified such market data.  Similarly, Bluegreen’s internal surveys, while believed by Bluegreen to be reliable, have not been verified by any independent sources.  Accordingly, such data may not prove to be accurate.



BBX Capital Real Estate



Overview



BBX Capital Real Estate’s activities consist of the monetization and management of assets in its portfolio and investments in real estate developments and unconsolidated real estate joint ventures. Legacy assets (assets retained following the BankAtlantic sale) include loans, foreclosed real estate and a portfolio of charged-off loans. BBX Capital Real Estate conducts land entitlement activities on certain properties acquired through foreclosure and land development projects which include selling or leasing the improved properties to third parties.



---

 

Strategies



BBX Capital Real Estate’s growth strategy is focused on:





Real Estate Developments



Beacon Lake Master Planned Development



The Company obtained entitlements to develop raw land in St. Johns County, Florida into 1,476 finished lots which will comprise the Beacon Lake Community.  The Company acquired this undeveloped property through foreclosure and it is anticipated that the finished lots will be sold to home builders.  The centerpiece of the community is the 43-acre Beacon Lake, which offers opportunities for outdoor recreation.  The planned amenities include a Junior Olympic lap pool, Splash Park, tennis courts, fitness center and a community dog park.  Single-family homes and townhomes are planned to range from 1,800 square feet to 4,000 square feet and priced from the high $200,000’s to the $500,000’s.  Construction began in January 2017.  The Company has entered into a purchase agreement with a home builder for approximately 152 finished lots with the first finished lot closing anticipated to occur during the first quarter of 2018.



PGA Station



The Company acquired land through foreclosure located in PGA Station, in the city of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida in 2014.  The property held by the PGA Design Center Holdings joint venture described below is adjacent to PGA Station.  During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company obtained governmental approvals to construct a 125 room limited-service suite hotel, a medical office building and three 60,000 square foot office buildings on vacant tracts of land in PGA Station.  The Company is the master developer of PGA station and intends to sell the developed land to third party developers.  The Company executed a sales contract for the hotel site with closing anticipated during the second quarter of 2017, subject to satisfactory completion of the prospective buyer’s due diligence and other closing conditions.



Gardens on Millenia



Gardens on Millenia consisted of 37 acres of land acquired through foreclosure located near the Mall at Millenia in a commercial center of Orlando, Florida.  During 2015, the Company obtained governmental approvals for a 300,000 square foot retail shopping center designed for multiple big-box and in-line tenants as well as two outparcel retail pads and nine rental apartment buildings totaling approximately 292 units. The Company contributed the portion of the land entitled for rental apartments to the Addison on Millenia Investment, LLC joint venture and contributed the portion of the land entitled for the retail center to the BBX/S Millenia Blvd Investments, LLC joint venture as initial capital contributions to the joint ventures. The Addison on Millenia Investment, LLC joint venture and the BBX/S Millenia Blvd Investments, LLC joint venture are described below in “Investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures”. 



---

 

Investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures



The Company had investments in the following real estate joint ventures as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):





The above investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures are described below.



Altis at Kendall Square, LLC (“Kendall Commons”)



In March 2013, the Company invested $1.3 million as one of a number of investors in a 321 unit multi-family development – Altis at Kendall Square – developed by Altman Development (“Altman”). The multifamily rental community is comprised of 12 three-story apartment buildings, one mixed-use building and one clubhouse. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the joint venture sold the development and the Company recognized $3.1 million of equity earnings and received $3.7 million of distributions from the joint venture.



Altis at Lakeline – Austin Investor, LLC



In December 2014, the Company invested $5.0 million as one of a number of investors in a planned multi-family development – Altis at Lakeline – being developed by Altman.  Located on an approximate 23 acre parcel in the northwest area of Austin, Texas, Altis at Lakeline is comprised of 19, two and three story, residential apartment buildings with 354 apartment units, 38 enclosed garages, and a private resort style 5,500 square foot clubhouse.  After all investors receive a specified return on capital  and the return of their contributed capital, any distributions thereafter are shared based on earnings with the managing member receiving an increasing percentage of distributions.  Construction commenced in the first quarter of 2015 and 312 units were available for lease with an occupancy rate of 49% as of December 31, 2016. 



New Urban/BBX Development, LLC (“Village at Victoria Park”)



Village at Victoria Park consists of a residential development on approximately 2 acres of previously vacant land previously owned by the Company that is located near downtown Fort Lauderdale, Florida. In December 2013, The Company invested in a joint venture with New Urban Communities to develop the project as 30 single-family homes.  The project is a 50% - 50% joint venture with New Urban Communities serving as the developer and manager of the joint venture.  The project commenced construction and sales during the third quarter of 2014. As of December 31, 2016, the joint venture closed on 10 single-family homes and has sales contracts on four additional homes.  



Bayview (Sunrise and Bayview Partners, LLC)



In June 2014, the Company invested in a joint venture with an affiliate of Procacci Development Corporation (“PDC”) with the Company and PDC each contributing $1.8 million to the Sunrise and Bayview Partners joint venture.  The joint venture acquired for $8.0 million approximately three acres of real estate located at Bayview Drive and Sunrise Boulevard in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.  The Company and PDC each have a 50% interest in the joint venture.  There is currently an approximate 84,000 square foot office building along with a convenience store and gas station on the property.  The office building has low occupancy with short term leases. The convenience store's lease ends in

---

 

March 2022.  The Company anticipates that the property will be redeveloped into a mixed-use project at some point in the future.



Hialeah Communities, LLC (Bonterra – CC Homes)



In July 2014, the Company invested in a joint venture with CC Bonterra to develop approximately 394 homes in a portion of Bonterra community in Hialeah, Florida.  The Company transferred approximately 50 acres of land acquired through foreclosure at an agreed upon value of approximately $15.6 million subject to an $8.3 million mortgage which was assumed by the joint venture.  In exchange, the Company received $2.2 million of cash and a joint venture interest with an agreed upon assigned initial capital contribution value of $4.9 million.  The Company receives 57% of the joint venture distributions until the Company receives its aggregate capital contributions plus a specified return on capital. Any distributions thereafter are shared with the managing member receiving an increased percentage of distributions.  During the year ended December 31, 2016, the joint venture closed on 212 single-family homes and the Company received $11.5 million of cash distributions and recognized $9.5 million of equity earnings from the joint venture.  As of December 31, 2016, the joint venture has executed sales contracts on an additional 109 single-family homes. 



PGA Design Center Holdings, LLC



In December 2013, the Company purchased for $6.1 million a commercial property in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, with three existing buildings consisting of 145,000 square feet of mainly furniture retail space. The property, which is located in a larger mixed use property now known as PGA Station was substantially vacant at the date of acquisition.  Subsequent to the acquisition of the property, the Company entered into a joint venture with Stiles Development which acquired a 60% interest in the joint venture for $2.9 million in cash.  The Company contributed the property (excluding certain residential development entitlements having an estimated value of $1.2 million) to the joint venture in exchange for $2.9 million in cash and the remaining 40% interest in the joint venture.  The Company transferred the retained residential development entitlements to adjacent parcels owned by it in PGA Station (see above for a discussion of the other parcels owned by the Company in PGA Station).  During the year ended December 31, 2016, governmental approvals were obtained to change the use of a portion of the property from retail to office.  The joint venture intends to sell or lease the buildings. 



CCB Miramar, LLC



In May 2015, the Company invested in a joint venture with two separate unaffiliated developers relating to the acquisition of real estate in Miramar, Florida for the construction of single-family homes.  The Company contributed $875,000 for an approximate 35% interest in the joint venture and one of the developers contributed to the joint venture a contract to purchase the real estate. The purchase of the real estate is subject to certain closing conditions, including receipt of all necessary entitlements and completion of due diligence by the joint venture.



Centra Falls, LLC



In August 2015, the Company invested as one of a number of investors in a joint venture with an unaffiliated developer for the development and sale of 89 townhomes in Pembroke Pines, Florida.  The Company contributed $750,000 and is entitled to receive 7.143% of the joint venture distributions until it receives the return of its aggregate capital contributions plus a specified return on its investment. Any distributions thereafter are shared with the managing member receiving an increased percentage of distributions. The project commenced construction and sales during the third quarter of 2015.  As of December 31, 2016, the joint venture closed on 21 townhomes and has executed contracts on an additional 54 townhomes.



The Addison on Millenia Investment, LLC



In December 2015, the Company invested as one of a number of investors in a joint venture to develop 11.8 acres in the Gardens on Millenia site located in Orlando, Florida into nine retail apartment buildings containing approximately 292 units.  The joint venture currently intends to hold the property and operate the apartment project as an income producing business.   The Company transferred property with an agreed upon value of $5.8 million and $0.3 million of cash for its initial joint venture contribution. The Company is entitled to receive 48% of the joint venture distributions until it receives its aggregate capital contributions plus a specified return in its investment. Any distributions thereafter are shared based on earnings with the managing member receiving an increasing percentage of distributions. Construction commenced in the first quarter of 2016 and leasing of apartment units is anticipated to begin during the first quarter of 2017. 



---

 

BBX/S Millenia Blvd Investments, LLC



In October 2015, the Company and a developer invested in a joint venture to develop a retail center on the Gardens of Millenia site in Orlando, Florida.  The joint venture intends to construct the center, lease the premises and sell the property. The Company transferred property with an agreed upon value of $7.0 million to the joint venture and received $0.7 million in cash and a 90% interest in the joint venture.  The Company is entitled to receive 90% of joint venture distributions until it receives its aggregate capital contributions plus a specified return on its investment.  Any distributions thereafter are shared with the managing member receiving an increased percentage of the distributions. The joint venture completed the construction of the retail center, two anchor tenants are open for business and the joint venture anticipates selling the retail center in 2017.



Altis at Bonterra – Hialeah, LLC



In December 2015, the Company invested in a joint venture with Altman to develop approximately 314 apartment homes in a portion of Bonterra communities in Hialeah, Florida. The Company transferred approximately 14 acres of land at an agreed upon value of approximately $9.4 million and cash of $7.5 million to the joint venture.  The Company is entitled to receive 95% of the joint venture distributions until it receives its aggregate capital contributions plus a specified return on its investment. Any distributions thereafter are shared based on earnings with the managing member receiving an increased percentage of the distributions.   Construction commenced during the first quarter of 2016 and leasing of apartment units is anticipated to begin during the first quarter of 2017. 



Altis at Shingle Creek Manager, LLC



During April 2016, the Company invested in a joint venture with Altman and an investor to develop approximately 356 apartment homes on 24 acres of land located in Kissimmee, Florida. The Company invested approximately $332,000 for a 2.5% interest in the joint venture.  The Company is entitled to receive 2.5% of the joint venture distributions until it receives its aggregate capital contribution plus a specified return on its investment. Any distributions thereafter are shared based on earnings with the managing member receiving an increasing percentage of the distributions.   Construction commenced during the fourth quarter of 2016 and leasing of apartment units is anticipated to begin during the third quarter of 2017. 



Centra Falls II, LLC



During 2016, the Company invested as one of a number of investors in a joint venture with Label & Co. to develop 61 town homes on land located in the City of Pembroke Pines, Broward County, Florida. The Company contributed $571,000 to the joint venture and is entitled to receive 7.143% of the joint venture distributions until it receives its aggregate capital contribution plus a specified return on its investment.  Any distributions thereafter are shared with the managing member receiving an increased percentage of the distributions.  Construction is expected to commence in the first quarter of 2017 and closings are anticipated to commence during the fourth quarter of 2017.



Legacy Assets



Legacy assets in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2016 primarily consisted of $25.5 million of loans receivable, $12.0 million of real estate held-for-investment and $33.3 million of real estate held-for-sale.  PGA Station and the Gardens on Millenia real estate developments discussed above are included in real estate held-for-sale with an aggregate carrying value of $9.2 million as of December 31, 2016.  These legacy assets are described in further detail in Item 8 – Note 5 and Note 8 of this report.



The majority of the legacy assets do not generate income on a regular or predictable basis. As a consequence BBX Capital Real Estate does not expect to generate significant revenue from the legacy assets until the assets are monetized through repayments or transactions involving the sale, joint venture or development of the underlying real estate. The cash flow from the monetization of legacy assets are generally invested in income producing real estate, real estate developments and real estate joint ventures as well as in the Company’s middle market operating businesses.  As a result of the substantial decline in real estate values during the recession, the majority of legacy non-performing commercial real estate loans and foreclosed real estate were written down in prior periods to the then prevailing estimated fair values of the collateral less costs to sell.  The Company believes there has been continued improvements generally in real estate markets and believes that the prior estimated fair values of the underlying collateral securing certain of its commercial real estate loans and its real estate carrying values may be below current market values.  Additionally, this recovery in the real estate market has favorably affected the financial condition of borrowers and the Company is aggressively pursuing its borrowers and/or guarantors in order to maximize recoveries through cash settlements, loan workout arrangements or participation interests in the development or performance of

---

 

the collateral.  If the Company is successful in its efforts, the Company expects to recognize gains to the extent that the amounts it collects exceed the carrying value of its commercial loans and foreclosed real estate.



Middle Market Division



Overview



The Middle Market Division invests in operating companies and businesses with revenues of less than $250 million.   Renin, which was acquired in October 2013 and has the highest revenue of our portfolio companies in this division, manufactures products for the home improvement industry and operates through headquarters in Canada and two manufacturing assembly and distribution facilities in Canada and the United States.  Since December 2013, the Middle Market Division also has made investments and has completed acquisitions in the sugar and confectionery industry through the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, BBX Sweet Holdings. In 2016, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company entered into area development agreements with MOD Super Fast Pizza Franchising, LLC with a goal of developing approximately 60 MOD franchised pizza restaurant locations throughout Florida over the next seven years.



Products and Sales Channels



Renin’s products include sliding bipass and bifold closet doors, room dividers including barn-style doors and hardware, fabricated glass and home décor products. While the majority of Renin’s products are manufactured at its facilities located in Canada and the United States, a portion of its products are sourced from suppliers in China.  Renin products are sold through three distinct channels in North America: retail, wholesale, and direct in the metropolitan Toronto area (“Toronto Area”).  Retail currently makes up over 50% of Renin’s sales and includes big box retail customers such as Home Depot and Lowes.  Wholesale, which includes OEMs and fabricators across North America, makes up approximately 30% of Renin’s sales.  The Toronto Area, where Renin operates an installation business, generates the remaining sales.    



BBX Sweet Holdings’ products include fine chocolates, chocolate drenched candies, tropical snacks, and hard candies, all of which are made at facilities located in Utah and Florida. BBX Sweet Holdings’ fine chocolates are sold directly to consumers at its nine Hoffman’s Chocolates retail chocolate locations in South Florida. BBX Sweet Holdings’ other products are sold to retailers or distributors.



Strategies



The business and operating strategy for the portfolio of companies in the Middle Market Division focuses on:







Employees



Management believes that its relations with its employees are satisfactory. The Company currently maintains employee benefit programs that are considered by management to be generally competitive with programs provided by other major employers in its markets.



As of December 31, 2016, the Company and its subsidiaries had approximately 6,141 employees, with 5,729 employees at Bluegreen, of which 549 employees were located at Bluegreen’s headquarters in Boca Raton, Florida, and 5,180 employees were located in regional field offices throughout the United States and one office in Aruba.  





Competition



The industries in which the Company conducts business are very competitive and we also face substantial competition with respect to our investment activities from real estate developers and building construction companies from private equity funds, hedge funds and other institutional investors. The Company competes with institutions and entities that are larger and have greater resources than the resources available to the Company.  Four unaffiliated companies in the candy and confectionery industry currently account for approximately 71% of the industry’s revenues reflecting

---

 

significant fragmentation in the industry in which Sweet Holdings operates.  Renin’s products are sold mainly to large retailers as well as to housing and building construction companies. The industry in which Renin operates experiences intense competition from foreign importers and producers.  MOD Pizza competes with established pizza brands, new entrants into the fast casual pizza category, especially in Florida, and for prime locations, with other operators.  Bluegreen competes with various high profile and well-established operators, many of which have greater liquidity and financial resources than Bluegreen. Further, Bluegreen competes with numerous smaller owners and operators of vacation ownership resorts and also faces competition from alternative lodging options available to consumers through both traditional methods of delivery as well as new web portals and applications, including private rentals of homes or apartments or condominium units, which have increased in popularity in recent years.  Many of the world’s most recognized lodging, hospitality and entertainment companies develop and sell VOIs in resort properties.  Major companies that now operate or are developing or planning to develop vacation ownership resorts directly or through subsidiaries include Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation, the Walt Disney Company, Hilton, Wyndham, ILG and Diamond Resorts International.  Bluegreen also competes with numerous other smaller owners and operators of vacation ownership resorts.  In Bluegreen’s fee-based services business, Bluegreen typically competes with Hilton Hotels Corporation and Wyndham Worldwide Corporation.  In addition to competing for sales leads, prospects and fee-based service clients, Bluegreen competes with other VOI developers for marketing, sales, and resort management personnel.





Regulation



As a public company, we are subject to federal securities laws, including the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  In addition, the companies in which we hold investments are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations generally applicable to their respective businesses. 



Bluegreen



The vacation ownership and real estate industries are subject to extensive and complex governmental regulation.  Bluegreen is subject to various federal, state, local and foreign environmental, zoning, consumer protection and other laws, rules and regulations, including those regarding the acquisition, marketing and sale of real estate and VOIs and various aspects of Bluegreen’s financing operations.  On a federal level, the Federal Trade Commission has taken an active regulatory role through the Federal Trade Commission Act, which prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or unfair competition in interstate commerce.  In addition, many states have what are known as “Little FTC Acts” that apply to intrastate activity.  In addition to the laws applicable to Bluegreen’s customer financing and other operations discussed below, Bluegreen is or may be subject to the Fair Housing Act and various other federal laws, rules and regulations.  Bluegreen is also subject to various foreign laws with respect to La Cabana Beach Resort and Casino in Oranjestad, Aruba and Blue Water Resort at Cable Beach in Nassau, Bahamas.  In addition, in the future, VOIs may be deemed to be securities subject to regulation as such, which could have a material adverse effect on Bluegreen.  The cost of complying with applicable laws and regulations may be significant and Bluegreen may not maintain compliance at all times with all applicable laws, including those discussed below.  Any failure to comply with current or future applicable laws or regulations could have a material adverse effect on Bluegreen.



Bluegreen’s vacation ownership resorts are subject to various regulatory requirements, including state and local approvals.  The laws of most states require Bluegreen to file a detailed offering statement describing Bluegreen’s business and all material aspects of the project and sale of VOIs with a designated state authority.  In addition, when required by state law, Bluegreen provides its VOI purchasers with a public disclosure statement that contains, among other items, detailed information about the resort, the surrounding vicinity, and the purchaser’s rights and obligations as a VOI owner.  Laws in each state where Bluegreen sells VOIs generally grant the purchaser of a VOI the right to cancel a purchase contract at any time within a specified rescission period following the earlier of the date the contract was signed or the date the purchaser has received the last of the documents required to be provided by Bluegreen.  Most states have other laws that regulate Bluegreen’s activities, including real estate licensure requirements; sellers of travel licensure requirements; anti-fraud laws; telemarketing laws; prize, gift and sweepstakes laws; and labor laws.  



Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, the owner of real property generally is liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances located on or in, or emanating from, the property, as well as related costs of investigation and property damage.  These laws often impose such liability without regard to whether the owner knew of the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances.  The presence of these substances, or the failure to properly remediate these substances if they exist, may adversely affect the owner’s ability to sell or lease a property or to borrow using the real property as collateral.  Other federal and state laws require the removal or encapsulation of asbestos-containing material when this material is in poor condition or in the event of construction, demolition, remodeling or renovation.  Other statutes may require the removal of underground storage

---

 

tanks.  Noncompliance with these and other environmental, health or safety requirements may result in the need to cease or alter operations or development at a property.  In addition, certain state and local laws may impose liability on property developers with respect to construction defects discovered on the property or repairs made by future owners of such property.  Under these laws, Bluegreen may be required to pay for repairs to the developed property.  The development, management and operation of Bluegreen’s resorts are also subject to the Americans with Disabilities Act.



Bluegreen’s marketing, sales and customer financing activities are also subject to extensive regulation, which can include, but is not limited to: the Truth-in-Lending Act and Regulation Z; the Fair Housing Act; the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act; the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B; the Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E; the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act and Regulation C; the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act; Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices and Regulation AA; the Patriot Act; the Right to Financial Privacy Act; the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act; the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act; and anti-money laundering laws. The Dodd-Frank Act contains significant changes to the regulation of financial institutions, and related entities, including the creation of new federal regulatory agencies, and the granting of additional authorities and responsibilities to existing regulatory agencies to identify and address emerging systemic risks posed by the activities of financial services firms.  The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) is one such regulatory agency created pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act.  The CFPB’s mandate is to protect consumers by carrying out federal consumer financial laws and to publish rules and forms that facilitate understanding of the financial implications of the transactions consumers enter into.  Consistent with this mission, the CFPB amended Regulations X and Z to establish new disclosure requirements and forms in Regulation Z for most closed-end consumer credit transactions secured by real property.  The practical impact upon Bluegreen was the requirement to use a new Integrated Mortgage Disclosure Statement in lieu of the separate Good Faith Estimate and Closing Statement.  No assurance can be given that Bluegreen will be in compliance with this act or other applicable laws or that compliance with this rule or the promulgation of additional new standards by the CFPB will not have an adverse impact on Bluegreen.  In addition, Bluegreen’s term securitization transactions currently must comply with certain requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act, including the risk retention rules.



Bluegreen's management of, and dealings with, POAs, including Bluegreen's purchase of defaulted inventory from POAs in connection with its secondary market arrangements, is also subject to state laws and resort rules and regulations, including those with respect to the establishment of budgets and expenditures, rule-making, and the imposition of maintenance assessments.



During the year ended December 31, 2016, approximately 7% of Bluegreen’s VOI sales were generated by marketing to prospective purchasers obtained through internal and third-party vendors’ outbound telemarketing efforts.  Bluegreen attempts to monitor the actions and compliance of these third parties, but there are risks associated with Bluegreen’s and such third parties’ telemarketing efforts.  In recent years, state and federal regulators have increased regulations and enforcement actions related to telemarketing operations, including requiring the adherence to state “do not call” laws.  In addition, the Federal Trade Commission and Federal Communications Commission have implemented national “do not call” legislation.  These measures have significantly increased the costs associated with telemarketing.  While Bluegreen continues to be subject to telemarketing risks and potential liability, Bluegreen believes that its exposure to adverse impacts from this heightened telemarketing legislation and enforcement may be mitigated to some extent by the use of “permission marketing,” whereby Bluegreen obtains the permission of prospective purchasers to contact them in the future, thereby exempting such calls from the various “do not call” laws.  Bluegreen has also implemented policies and procedures which Bluegreen believes will help reduce the possibility that individuals who have requested to be placed on its internal company do not call list are not contacted, but such policies and procedures may not be effective in ensuring strict regulatory compliance.



To date, no material fines or penalties have been imposed on Bluegreen as a result of its telemarketing operations.  However, from time to time, Bluegreen has been the subject of proceedings for violation of the “do not call” laws and for violation of state laws applicable to the marketing and sale of VOIs.  Bluegreen may not be able to efficiently or effectively market to prospective purchasers through telemarketing operations in the future or successfully develop alternative sources of identifying and marketing to prospective purchasers of Bluegreen’s VOI products at acceptable costs.  In addition, Bluegreen may face significant non-compliance issues or additional costs of compliance, which may adversely impact Bluegreen’s results and operations in the future.



See also “Item 1A – Risk Factors” for a description of risks with respect to regulatory compliance and “Item 3 – Legal Proceedings” for a description of any pending regulatory actions.



 

---

 





ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS





We are subject to various risks and uncertainties relating to or arising out of the nature of our businesses, operations and investments, and general business, economic, financing, legal, regulatory, and other factors and conditions. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to either predict all risk factors or assess all potential impacts of any factor, or combination of factors, on BBX Capital Corporation or its subsidiaries, including with respect to their operations, results and financial condition. 



BBX Capital relies on dividends from Bluegreen to fund operations.



BBX Capital has relied and continues to rely primarily on dividends from Bluegreen in order to fund its operations and investments. Dividends from Bluegreen may not be paid to BBX Capital to the extent previously paid or when anticipated or at all. Bluegreen paid dividends totaling $54.4 million during 2015 and $70.0 million during 2016. The payment of dividends by Bluegreen is subject to compliance with financial covenants under its credit facilities and certain of Bluegreen's credit facilities contain terms which may limit the payment of cash dividends without the lender's consent or waiver. Decisions with respect to dividends by Bluegreen are generally based on, among other things, Bluegreen's operating results, financial condition, cash flow, and liquidity needs. Dividend payments to BBX Capital by any of its subsidiaries, including Bluegreen, could, in certain circumstances, be subject to claims made by creditors of such subsidiary.



If cash flow is not sufficient to fund BBX Capital's liquidity needs or BBX Capital otherwise determines it is advisable to do so, BBX Capital might seek to liquidate some of its investments or seek to fund its operations with the proceeds of additional equity or debt financing. Such financing may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all, and if BBX Capital chooses to liquidate its investments, it may be forced to do so at depressed prices.



BBX Capital’s acquisitions may reduce earnings, require it to obtain additional financing and expose it to additional risks.



BBX Capital’s business strategy includes investments in or acquisitions of operating companies, such as its acquisitions of Renin Corp. and the acquisitions of businesses by BBX Sweet Holdings in the candy and confections industry.  BBX Capital may also seek to make opportunistic investments outside of its existing portfolio. Some of these investments and acquisitions may be material. While BBX Capital is seeking investments and acquisitions primarily in companies that provide opportunities for growth, it may not be successful in identifying these opportunities. Investments or acquisitions that it completes may not prove to be successful or even if successful may not initially generate income, or may generate income on an irregular basis or over a long time period. Accordingly BBX Capital’s results of operations may vary significantly on a quarterly basis and from year to year. Acquisitions and investments will also expose BBX Capital, or increase BBX Capital’s exposure in the case of acquisitions of or additional investments in its portfolio companies, to the risks of any business acquired or invested in. Acquisitions entail numerous risks, including:





BBX Capital may not be able to acquire or profitably manage additional businesses, or to integrate successfully any acquired businesses, including Renin and the businesses BBX Sweet Holdings acquired, without substantial costs, delays or other operational or financial difficulties, including difficulties in integrating information systems and personnel and establishing control environment processes across acquired businesses.  The failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.  In addition, to the extent that operating businesses are acquired outside the United States or the State of Florida, there will be additional risks

---

 

related to compliance with foreign regulations and laws including tax laws, labor laws, currency fluctuations and geographic economic conditions.



In addition, there is significant competition for investments and acquisitions, which could increase the costs associated with the investment or acquisition.  Substantial costs are incurred in connection with the evaluation of potential acquisition and investment opportunities whether or not the acquisition or investment is ultimately consummated. Further, funding such investments or acquisitions may rely on additional debt or equity financing, which will subject BBX Capital to the risks and uncertainties described in these risk factors. If BBX Capital requires additional financing in the future, the financing may not be available when needed or on favorable terms, if at all. Additionally, BBX Capital does not intend to seek shareholder approval of any investments or acquisitions unless required by law or regulation or by BBX Capital’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws.



In addition, BBX Capital from time to time may consider transactions involving the sale of its subsidiaries or investments or other transactions which would result in a decrease in BBX Capital’s ownership interest in its subsidiaries, and there is no assurance that any such transactions, if pursued and consummated, will generate a profit or otherwise be advantageous to BBX Capital.



We may issue additional securities and incur additional indebtedness at BBX Capital or its subsidiaries.



BBX Capital may in the future seek to raise funds through the issuance of debt or equity securities. There is generally no restriction on BBX Capital’s ability to issue debt or equity securities which are pari passu or have a preference over its Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock. Authorized but unissued shares of BBX Capital’s capital stock are available for issuance from time to time at the discretion of BBX Capital’s board of directors, and any such issuance may be dilutive to BBX Capital’s shareholders.



Further, BBX Capital and its subsidiaries have in the past and may in the future incur significant amounts of debt, including at Bluegreen. Any indebtedness, including indebtedness incurred in the future could have several important effects on BBX Capital or its subsidiaries, including, without limitation, that BBX Capital or its subsidiaries may be required to use available cash for the payment of principal and interest due on its debt and that the outstanding indebtedness and leverage at BBX Capital or its subsidiaries will impact liquidity, and any negative changes in general economic and industry conditions will increase such impact.



Bluegreen’s business and operations, including its ability to market VOIs, may be adversely affected by general economic conditions and the availability of financing.



Bluegreen’s business is subject to risks related to general economic and industry conditions and trends.   Bluegreen’s results, operations and financial condition may be adversely affected by unfavorable general economic and industry conditions, such as high unemployment rates and job insecurity, declines in discretionary spending, declines in real estate values and the occurrence of geopolitical conflicts, including if these or other factors adversely impact the availability of financing for Bluegreen or Bluegreen’s customers or the ability of Bluegreen’s customers’ to otherwise pay amounts owed under notes receivable. Further, adverse changes affecting the vacation ownership industry, such as an oversupply of vacation ownership units, a reduction in demand for such units, changes in travel and other consumer preferences, demographic and vacation patterns, changes in governmental regulation of the industry, imposition of increased taxes by governmental authorities, the declaration of bankruptcy and/or credit defaults by other vacation ownership companies and negative publicity for the industry, could also have a material adverse effect on Bluegreen’s business. In addition, Bluegreen's operations and results may be negatively impacted if Bluegreen is unable to update its business strategy over time and from time to time in response to changing economic and industry conditions.



Bluegreen may be adversely affected by extensive federal, state and local laws and regulations and changes in applicable laws and regulations, including the cost of maintaining compliance with new or existing laws and regulations and the imposition of additional taxes on operations.  In addition, results of audits of Bluegreen’s tax returns or those of Bluegreen’s subsidiaries may have a material adverse impact on Bluegreen’s financial condition.



The federal government and the states and local jurisdictions in which Bluegreen operates have enacted extensive regulations that affect the manner in which Bluegreen markets and sells VOIs and conducts its other business operations.  In addition, many states have adopted specific laws and regulations regarding the sale of VOIs.  Many states, including Florida and South Carolina, where certain of Bluegreen’s resorts are located, extensively regulate

---

 

the creation and management of timeshare resorts, the marketing and sale of timeshare properties, the escrow of purchaser funds prior to the completion of construction and closing, the content and use of advertising materials and promotional offers, the delivery of an offering memorandum and the creation and operation of exchange programs and multi-site timeshare plan reservation systems. Moreover, with regard to sales conducted in South Carolina, the closing of real estate and mortgage loan transactions must be conducted under the supervision of an attorney licensed in South Carolina and otherwise in accordance with South Carolina’s Time Sharing Transaction Procedures Act.  Most states also have other laws that are applicable to Bluegreen’s activities, such as timeshare project registration laws, real estate licensure laws, mortgage licensure laws, sellers of travel licensure laws, anti-fraud laws, consumer protection laws, telemarketing laws, prize, gift and sweepstakes laws, and consumer credit laws.  Bluegreen's management of, and dealings with, POAs, including Bluegreen's purchase of defaulted inventory from POAs in connection with its Secondary Market Sales, is also subject to state laws and resort rules and regulations, including those with respect to the establishment of budgets and expenditures, rule-making, and the imposition of maintenance assessments.



Bluegreen currently is authorized to market and sell VOIs in all locations at which its marketing and sales are conducted.  If Bluegreen’s agents or employees violate applicable regulations or licensing requirements, their acts or omissions could cause the states where the violations occurred to revoke or refuse to renew Bluegreen’s licenses, render Bluegreen’s sales contracts void or voidable, or impose fines on Bluegreen based on past activities.



Further, the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau, created under the Dodd-Frank Act, has emphasized new regulatory focus on areas of Bluegreen’s business such as consumer mortgage servicing and debt collection, credit reporting and consumer financial disclosures, all of which affect the manner in which Bluegreen provides purchase money financing to the purchasers of its VOIs and conducts its lending and loan servicing operations.



In addition, the federal government and the states and local jurisdictions in which Bluegreen conducts business have generally enacted extensive regulations relating to direct marketing and telemarketing, including the federal government’s national “Do Not Call” list, and the making of marketing and related calls to cell phone users, a significant development in light of cell phone usage rapidly becoming the primary method of communication.  The regulations have impacted Bluegreen’s marketing of VOIs, and Bluegreen has taken steps designed to ensure compliance with these new regulations.  However, these steps have increased and are expected to continue to increase Bluegreen’s marketing costs and may not prevent failures in compliance.  Bluegreen cannot predict the impact that these legislative initiatives or any other legislative measures that may be proposed or enacted in the future may have on Bluegreen’s marketing strategies and results.  Further, from time to time, complaints are filed against Bluegreen by individuals claiming that they received calls in violation of applicable regulations.



Currently, most states have taxed VOIs as real estate, imposing property taxes that are billed to the respective POAs that maintain the related resorts and have not sought to impose sales tax upon the sale of the VOI or accommodations tax upon the use of the VOI.  From time to time, however, various states have attempted to promulgate new laws or apply existing laws impacting the taxation of VOIs to require that sales or accommodations taxes be collected.  Should new state or local laws be implemented or interpreted to impose sales or accommodations taxes on VOIs, Bluegreen’s business could be materially adversely affected.



From time to time, consumers file complaints against Bluegreen in the ordinary course of Bluegreen’s business.  Bluegreen could be required to incur significant costs to resolve these complaints or enter into consents with regulators regarding its activities.  Bluegreen may not remain in compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations, and violations of applicable laws may have adverse implications on Bluegreen, including negative public relations, potential litigation and regulatory sanctions.  The expense, negative publicity and potential sanctions associated with any failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations could have a material adverse effect on Bluegreen’s results of operations or financial position.



In addition, VOIs may in the future be deemed to be securities under federal or state law and therefore subject to applicable securities regulation, which could have a material adverse effect on Bluegreen due to, among other things, the cost of compliance with such regulations.



The vacation ownership and hospitality industries are highly competitive, and Bluegreen may not be able to compete successfully.



Bluegreen competes with various high profile and well-established operators, many of which have greater liquidity and financial resources than Bluegreen.  Many of the world's most recognized lodging, hospitality and entertainment companies develop and sell time-share units or VOIs in resort properties.  Bluegreen also competes with numerous

---

 

smaller owners and operators of vacation ownership resorts and also faces competition from alternative lodging options available to consumers through both traditional methods of delivery as well as new web portals and applications, including private rentals of homes or apartments or condominium units, which have increased in popularity in recent years.  Bluegreen's ability to remain competitive and to attract and retain customers depends on its customers' satisfaction with its products and services as well as on distinguishing the quality, value, and efficiency of its products and services from those offered by its competitors.  Customer dissatisfaction with experiences at its resorts or otherwise as a member of the Bluegreen Vacation Club, including due to an inability to use points for desired stays, could result in negative publicity and/or a decrease in sales, or otherwise adversely impact Bluegreen's ability to successfully compete in the vacation ownership and hospitality industries.  Bluegreen may not be able to timely and sufficiently identify and remediate the cause of customer dissatisfaction.  Any of these events could materially and adversely impact Bluegreen's operating results and financial condition.



Bluegreen would suffer substantial losses and Bluegreen’s liquidity position could be adversely impacted if customers to whom Bluegreen provides financing default on their obligations.



Prior to December 15, 2008, Bluegreen did not perform credit checks on the purchasers of its VOIs in connection with Bluegreen’s financing of their purchases.  Effective December 15, 2008, Bluegreen implemented a FICO® score-based credit underwriting program.  Bluegreen enhanced this credit underwriting program starting in January 2010.  While Bluegreen’s loan portfolio originated after December 15, 2008 has to date experienced defaults at a lower rate than loans originated prior to that date, Bluegreen’s FICO® score-based underwriting standards may not continue to result in decreased default rates or otherwise result in the improved performance of Bluegreen’s notes receivable.  Adverse conditions in the mortgage industry, including credit availability, borrowers’ financial profiles, prepayment rates and other factors, including those outside Bluegreen’s control, may increase the default rates Bluegreen experiences or otherwise negatively impact the performance of its notes receivable.  In recent years, external parties have been discouraging certain borrowers from staying current on their note payments.  Although in many cases Bluegreen may have recourse against a buyer for the unpaid purchase price, certain states have laws that limit Bluegreen’s ability to recover personal judgments against customers who have defaulted on their loans or Bluegreen may determine that the cost of doing so may not be justified.  Historically, Bluegreen has generally not pursued such recourse against its customers.  In the case of Bluegreen’s notes receivable secured by VOIs, if Bluegreen is unable to collect the defaulted amount due, Bluegreen traditionally has terminated the customer’s interest in the Bluegreen Vacation Club and then remarketed the recovered VOI.  Irrespective of Bluegreen’s remedy in the event of a default, Bluegreen cannot recover the marketing, selling and administrative costs associated with the original sale and such costs generally exceed the cash received by Bluegreen from the buyer at the time of the sale.  In addition, Bluegreen will need to incur such costs again in order to resell the VOI.  Bluegreen updates its estimate of such future losses each quarter, and consequently, the charge against sales in a particular period may be impacted, favorably or unfavorably, by a change in expected losses related to notes originated in prior periods.  In addition, defaults may cause buyers of, or lenders whose loans are secured by, Bluegreen’s VOI notes receivable to reduce the amount of availability or advance rates under receivables purchase and credit facilities, or to result in an increase the interest costs associated with such facilities.  In such an event, the cost of financing may increase and Bluegreen may not be able to secure replacement or alternative financing on terms acceptable to Bluegreen, if at all, which would adversely affect Bluegreen’s earnings, financial position and liquidity.



Under the terms of Bluegreen’s pledged and receivable sale facilities, Bluegreen may be required, under certain circumstances, to replace receivables or to pay down the loan to within permitted loan-to-value ratios.  Additionally, the terms of Bluegreen’s securitization transactions require Bluegreen to repurchase or replace loans if Bluegreen breached any of the representations and warranties Bluegreen made at the time Bluegreen sold the receivables.  These agreements also often include terms providing that in the event of defaults or delinquencies by customers in excess of stated thresholds, or if other performance thresholds are not met, substantially all of Bluegreen’s cash flow from its retained interest in the receivable portfolios sold will be required to be paid to the parties who purchased the receivables from Bluegreen.



While Bluegreen has attempted to restructure its business to reduce its need for and reliance on financing for liquidity in the short term, there is no assurance that Bluegreen’s business and profitability will not be impacted by its ability to obtain financing, which may not be available on favorable terms, or at all. 



In connection with sales of VOIs, Bluegreen may offer financing to the purchaser of up to 90% of the purchase price of the VOI.  However, Bluegreen incurs selling, marketing and administrative cash expenditures prior to and concurrent with the sale.  These costs generally exceed the down payment Bluegreen receives at the time of the sale.  Accordingly, Bluegreen’s ability to borrow against or sell its notes receivable has historically been a critical factor in Bluegreen’s continued liquidity, and Bluegreen therefore has depended on funds from its credit facilities and

---

 

securitization transactions to finance its operations.  If Bluegreen’s pledged receivables facilities terminate or expire and Bluegreen is unable to extend them or replace them with comparable facilities, or if Bluegreen is unable to continue to participate in securitization-type transactions and “warehouse” facilities on acceptable terms, Bluegreen’s liquidity, cash flow and profitability would be materially and adversely affected.  Credit market disruptions have in the past adversely impacted the willingness of banks and other finance companies to provide “warehouse” lines of credit for VOI receivables and resulted from time to time in the term securitization market being unavailable.  Future credit market disruptions may have similar effects or otherwise make obtaining additional and replacement external sources of liquidity more difficult and more costly.



In addition, financing for real estate acquisition and development and the capital markets for corporate debt is cyclical.  While Bluegreen has increased its focus on expanding its fee-based service business and encouraging higher down payments in connection with sales.  There is no assurance that these initiatives will enhance Bluegreen’s financial position or otherwise be successful in the long term. 



Notwithstanding the initiatives implemented by Bluegreen to improve its cash position, Bluegreen anticipates that it will continue to seek and use external sources of liquidity, including funds that Bluegreen obtains pursuant to additional borrowings under its existing credit facilities, under credit facilities that Bluegreen may obtain in the future, under securitizations in which Bluegreen may participate in the future or pursuant to other borrowing arrangements, to:

  



Bluegreen’s ability to service or refinance its indebtedness or to obtain additional financing (including its ability to consummate future term securitizations) depends on the credit markets and on Bluegreen’s future performance, which is subject to a number of factors, including the success of Bluegreen’s business, Bluegreen’s results of operations, leverage, financial condition and business prospects, prevailing interest rates, general economic conditions, the performance of Bluegreen’s receivables portfolio, and perceptions about the vacation ownership and real estate industries.



As of December 31, 2016, Bluegreen had $7.5 million of indebtedness scheduled to become due during 2017.  Historically, much of Bluegreen’s debt has been renewed or refinanced in the ordinary course of business.  However, there is no assurance that Bluegreen will in the future be able to obtain sufficient external sources of liquidity on attractive terms, or at all, or otherwise renew, extend or refinance all or any portion of its outstanding debt.  Any of these occurrences may have a material adverse impact on Bluegreen’s liquidity and financial condition.



Bluegreen's indebtedness may impact its financial condition and results of operations, and the terms of Bluegreen's indebtedness may limit its activities.



Bluegreen's level of debt and debt service requirements have several important effects on Bluegreen's operations.  Significant debt service cash requirements reduce the funds available for operations and future business opportunities and increase Bluegreen's vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions, as well as conditions in the credit markets generally.  In addition, Bluegreen's leverage position increases its vulnerability to economic and competitive pressures and may limit funds available for acquisitions, working capital, capital expenditures, dividends, and other general corporate purposes.  Further, the financial covenants and other restrictions contained in indentures, credit agreements and other agreements relating to Bluegreen's indebtedness require Bluegreen to meet certain financial tests and restrict Bluegreen's ability to, among other things, pay dividends, borrow additional funds, dispose of assets or make investments.  If Bluegreen fails to comply with the terms of its debt instruments, such debt may become due and payable immediately, which would have a material adverse impact on Bluegreen's cash position and financial condition.  Significant resources may be required to monitor Bluegreen's compliance with its debt instruments (from a quantitative and qualitative perspective), and such monitoring efforts may not be effective in all cases.



To the extent inflationary trends, tightened credit markets or other factors affect interest rates, Bluegreen’s debt service costs may increase.  If interest rates increased one percentage point, the effect on interest expense related to Bluegreen’s variable-rate debt would be an annual increase of $2.8 million, based on December 31, 2016 balances. 



---

 

The ratings of third-party rating agencies could adversely impact Bluegreen’s ability to obtain, renew or extend credit facilities, or otherwise raise funds.



Rating agencies from time to time review prior corporate and specific transaction ratings in light of tightened ratings criteria.  In December 2016, Standard & Poor’s Rating Services affirmed Bluegreen’s ‘B+’ credit rating.  Bluegreen’s corporate credit rating is also based, in part, on rating agencies’ speculation about Bluegreen’s potential future debt and dividend levels.  If rating agencies were to downgrade Bluegreen’s corporate credit ratings, Bluegreen’s ability to raise funds on favorable terms, or at all, and Bluegreen’s liquidity, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely impacted.  In addition, if rating agencies downgraded their original ratings on certain bond classes in Bluegreen’s securitizations, holders of such bonds may be required to sell bonds in the marketplace, and such sales could occur at a discount, which could impact the perceived value of the bonds and Bluegreen’s ability to sell future bonds on favorable terms or at all.  While Bluegreen is not currently aware of any reasonably likely downgrades to its corporate credit rating or the ratings of bond classes in its securitizations, such ratings changes can occur without advance notice.



Bluegreen’s future success depends on its ability to market its products and services successfully and efficiently and Bluegreen’s marketing expenses have increased and may continue to increase in the future.



Bluegreen competes for customers with hotel and resort properties, other vacation ownership resorts and alternative lodging options, including private rentals of homes and apartments or condominium units.  The identification of sales prospects and leads, and the marketing of Bluegreen’s products and services to them are essential to Bluegreen’s success.  Bluegreen incurs expenses associated with marketing programs in advance of the closing of sales.  If Bluegreen’s lead identification and marketing efforts do not yield enough leads or Bluegreen is unable to successfully convert sales leads to sales, Bluegreen may be unable to recover the expense of its marketing programs and systems and its business, operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected.  In addition, Bluegreen is currently focusing and has increased its marketing efforts on selling to new customers, which typically involves a relatively higher marketing cost compared to sales to existing owners and therefore has increased and is expected to continue to increase Bluegreen’s sales and marketing expenses.  If Bluegreen is not successful in offsetting the cost increase with greater sales revenue, Bluegreen’s operating results and financial condition would be adversely impacted.  In addition, Bluegreen's marketing efforts are subject to the risk of changing consumer behavior.  Changes in consumer behavior may adversely impact the effectiveness of marketing efforts and strategies which Bluegreen has in place and Bluegreen may not be able to timely and effectively respond to such changes.



Changes in new forms of competition, including but not limited to internet marketing models or online applications may impact Bluegreen’s ability for lead generation.



Bluegreen generates a significant portion of its new sales prospects and leads through its arrangements with various third parties, including Bass Pro and Choice Hotels.  If these arrangements do not generate a sufficient number of leads or if these arrangements are terminated or limited and not replaced by other sources of sales prospects and leads, Bluegreen may not be able to successfully market and sell its products and services to new customers at current sales levels, at anticipated levels or at levels required in order to offset the costs associated with its marketing efforts.  This would adversely impact Bluegreen’s operating results and financial condition.



Bluegreen may not be successful in maintaining or expanding its capital-light business relationships, or its capital-light activities, including fee based sales and marketing arrangements, just-in-time VOI arrangements, and Secondary Market Sales activities, and such activities may not be profitable, which may have an adverse impact on Bluegreen’s results of operations and financial condition.



Bluegreen offers fee-based marketing, sales, resort management and other services to third-party developers.  Bluegreen has over the last several years continued to expand its capital-light business strategy, which Bluegreen believes enables it to leverage its expertise in sales and marketing, resort management, mortgage servicing, construction management and title services.  Bluegreen currently intends to continue its focus on its capital-light business activities as such activities generally produce positive cash flow and typically require less capital investment than Bluegreen’s traditional vacation ownership business.  Bluegreen has attempted to structure these activities to cover its costs and generate a profit.  Sales of third party developers' VOIs must generate sufficient cash to comply with the terms of their financing obligations as well as to pay the fees or commissions due Bluegreen.  The third party developers may not be able to obtain or maintain financing necessary to meet the developer’s requirements, which could impact Bluegreen's ability to sell the developers' inventory.  While Bluegreen could attempt to utilize other arrangements, including just-in-time arrangements, where Bluegreen would utilize its receivable credit facilities in order to provide fee-based marketing and sales services, this would reduce the credit

---

 

otherwise available to Bluegreen and impact profitability.  Bluegreen commenced its capital-light activities largely during the recession in response to poor economic conditions and Bluegreen’s fee-based and other capital-light business activities in the future may be adversely impacted by changes in economic conditions.  While Bluegreen performs fee-based sales and marketing services, Bluegreen sells VOIs in a resort developed by a third party as an interest in the Bluegreen Vacation Club.  This subjects Bluegreen to a number of risks typically associated with selling products developed by others under its own brand name, including litigation risks.  Additionally, third party resorts may not meet Bluegreen’s expectations or match the needs of Bluegreen’s owners.



Bluegreen also sells VOI inventory through Secondary Market arrangements which require low levels of capital deployment.  In connection with Secondary Market Sales, Bluegreen acquires VOI inventory from its resorts’ POAs on a non-committed basis in close proximity to the timing of when Bluegreen intends to sell such VOIs.  VOIs purchased from POAs are typically obtained by the POAs through foreclosure in connection with maintenance fee defaults and are generally acquired by Bluegreen at a discount.  While Bluegreen intends to increase its Secondary Market Sales efforts in the future, Bluegreen may not be successful in doing so, and these efforts may not result in Bluegreen achieving anticipated results.  Further Bluegreen’s Secondary Market Sale activities may subject Bluegreen to negative publicity, which could adversely impact Bluegreen’s reputation and business. 



Bluegreen’s results of operations and financial condition may be materially and adversely impacted if Bluegreen does not continue to participate in exchange networks and other strategic alliances with third parties or if Bluegreen’s customers are not satisfied with the networks in which Bluegreen participates or Bluegreen’s strategic alliances.



Bluegreen believes that its participation in exchange networks and other strategic alliances and its Traveler Plus™ program make ownership of Bluegreen VOIs more attractive by providing owners with the ability to take advantage of vacation experiences in addition to stays at Bluegreen’s resorts.  A VOI owner’s participation in the RCI exchange network allows an owner to exchange their annual VOI for occupancy at over 4,300 participating resorts, based upon availability and the payment of a variable exchange fee.  During 2016, approximately 9% of Bluegreen owners utilized the RCI exchange network for an exchange of two or more nights.  Bluegreen also has a strategic arrangement with Choice Hotels pursuant to which, subject to payments and conditions, certain of Bluegreen’s resorts have been branded as part of Choice Hotels’ Ascend Resort Collection® and Ascend Hotel Collection®.  In addition, Bluegreen’s Traveler Plus™ members have the ability to convert their Bluegreen Vacation Club points into Choice Privileges® points which can be used for stays at participating Choice Hotels or may convert their Bluegreen Vacation Club points to stay at Ascend Collection® hotels.  Also, all Bluegreen Vacation Club members may convert their Bluegreen Vacation Club points for Choice Privileges® points for a fee.  Bluegreen Vacation Club members, for an additional annual fee, may also participate in the Bluegreen Traveler Plus™ program which allows them to use their points for a variety of hotel stays, RV site stays within the “Coast to Coast" network, or various cruise vacations.  Also, for a nominal fee, Bluegreen Vacation Club owners who purchased or upgraded their VOI since July 1, 2007 and participate in the Bluegreen Traveler Plus™ program have the ability to use their vacation points to reserve accommodations in 43 additional resort locations through Direct Exchange.  Bluegreen may not be able to or desire to continue to participate in the RCI or Direct Exchange networks in the future.  In addition, these networks and Bluegreen’s Traveler Plus™ program may not continue to operate effectively, and Bluegreen’s customers may not be satisfied with them.  Further, Bluegreen’s relationship with Choice Hotels may not be well received by Bluegreen’s customers or otherwise result in the benefits Bluegreen expects to derive from the relationship.  In addition, Bluegreen may not be successful in identifying or entering into new strategic relationships in the future.  If any of these events should occur, Bluegreen’s results of operations and financial condition may be materially and adversely impacted.



The resale market for VOIs could adversely affect Bluegreen’s business.



Based on Bluegreen’s experience at its resorts and at resorts owned by third parties, Bluegreen believes that resales of VOIs in the secondary market generally are made at net sales prices below the original customer purchase prices.  The relatively lower sales prices are partly attributable to the high marketing and sales costs associated with the initial sales of such VOIs.  Accordingly, the initial purchase price of a VOI may be less attractive to prospective buyers and Bluegreen competes with buyers who seek to resell their VOIs.  While VOI resale clearing houses or brokers currently do not have a material impact on Bluegreen’s business, the availability of resale VOIs at lower prices, particularly if an organized and liquid secondary market develops, could adversely affect Bluegreen’s level of sales and sales prices, which in turn would adversely affect Bluegreen’s results of operations.



---

 

Bluegreen is subject to the risks of the real estate market and the risks associated with real estate development, including a decline in real estate values and a deterioration of other conditions relating to the real estate market and real estate development.



Real estate markets are cyclical in nature and highly sensitive to changes in national and regional economic conditions, including:





A deterioration in general economic conditions or in the real estate market would have a material adverse effect on Bluegreen’s business.



To the extent Bluegreen decides to acquire more real estate inventory in the future, the availability of land for development of resort properties at favorable prices at that time will be critical to Bluegreen’s profitability and the ability to cover its significant selling, general and administrative expenses, cost of capital and other expenses.  If Bluegreen is unable to acquire such land or resort properties at a favorable cost, Bluegreen’s results of operations may be materially, adversely impacted.  The profitability of Bluegreen’s real estate development activities is also impacted by the cost of construction materials and services.  Should the cost of construction materials and services rise, the ultimate cost of Bluegreen’s future resorts inventory when developed could increase and have a material, adverse impact on Bluegreen’s results of operations.



Adverse outcomes in legal or other regulatory proceedings, including claims of non-compliance with applicable regulations or development-related defects, could adversely affect Bluegreen’s financial condition and operating results.



In the ordinary course of business, Bluegreen is subject to litigation and other legal and regulatory proceedings, which result in significant expenses and devotion of time.  In addition, litigation is inherently uncertain and adverse outcomes in the litigation and other proceedings to which Bluegreen is or may be subject could adversely affect its financial condition and operating results.



Bluegreen engages third-party contractors to construct its resorts.  Bluegreen also historically engaged third-party contractors to develop the communities within its former Bluegreen Communities business.  However, Bluegreen’s customers may assert claims against Bluegreen for construction defects or other perceived development defects, including, without limitation, structural integrity, the presence of mold as a result of leaks or other defects, water intrusion, asbestos, electrical issues, plumbing issues, road construction, water and sewer defects and defects in the engineering of amenities.  In addition, certain state and local laws may impose liability on property developers with respect to development defects discovered in the future.  Bluegreen could have to accrue a significant portion of the cost to repair such defects in the quarter when such defects arise or when the repair costs are reasonably estimable.  In addition, liabilities related to Bluegreen Communities that were not assumed by Southstar Development Partners, Inc. (“Southstar”) in connection with Southstar’s purchase of substantially all of the assets which comprised Bluegreen Communities on May 4, 2012, including those relating to Bluegreen Communities’ operations prior to the closing of the transaction, remain Bluegreen’s responsibility. 



See “Item 3 - Legal Proceedings” for a description of currently pending legal matters with respect to Bluegreen.  Costs associated with litigation, including claims for development-related defects, and the outcomes thereof could adversely affect Bluegreen’s liquidity, financial condition and operating results.



Environmental liabilities, including claims with respect to mold or hazardous or toxic substances, could have a material adverse impact on Bluegreen’s financial condition and operating results.



Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, as well as common law, Bluegreen may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances, including mold, located on, in or emanating from property that Bluegreen owns, leases or operates, as well as related costs of investigation and

---

 

property damage at such property.  These laws often impose liability without regard to whether Bluegreen knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of the hazardous or toxic substances.  The presence of such substances, or the failure to properly remediate such substances, may adversely affect Bluegreen’s ability to sell or lease its property or to borrow money using such property or receivables generated from the sale of such property as collateral.  Noncompliance with environmental, health or safety requirements may require Bluegreen to cease or alter operations at one or more of its properties.  Further, Bluegreen may be subject to common law claims by third parties based on damages and costs resulting from violations of environmental regulations or from contamination associated with one or more of Bluegreen’s properties.



A failure to maintain the integrity of internal or customer data could result in damage to Bluegreen's reputation and subject Bluegreen to costs, fines, or lawsuits.



Bluegreen's operations and activities require the collection and retention of large volumes of internal and customer data, including credit card numbers and other personally identifiable information of Bluegreen's customers and employees.  The integrity and protection of that customer, employee and company data is critical to Bluegreen.  If that data is inaccurate or incomplete, Bluegreen could make faulty decisions.  Bluegreen's customers and employees also have a high expectation that Bluegreen will adequately protect their personal information.  The information, security and privacy requirements imposed by governmental regulation are increasingly demanding.  Bluegreen's systems may not be able to satisfy these changing requirements and employee and customer expectations, or may require significant additional investments or time in order to do so.  Efforts to hack or breach security measures, failures of systems or software to operate as designed or intended, viruses, operator error, or inadvertent releases of data all threaten Bluegreen's information systems and records.  Bluegreen's reliance on computer, Internet-based and mobile systems and communications and the frequency and sophistication of efforts by hackers to gain unauthorized access to such systems have increased significantly in recent years.  A significant theft, loss, or fraudulent use of customer, employee, or company data could adversely impact Bluegreen's reputation and could result in remedial and other expenses, fines, or litigation and could have a material adverse impact on Bluegreen’s results of operations and financial condition.



Bluegreen’s technology requires updating, the cost involved in updating the technology may be significant, and the failure to keep pace with developments in technology could impair Bluegreen's operations or competitive position.



The vacation ownership and hospitality industries require the utilization of technology and systems, including technology utilized for sales and marketing, mortgage servicing, property management, brand assurance and compliance, and reservation systems.  This technology requires continuous updating and refinements, including technology required to remain competitive and to comply with the legal requirements such as privacy regulations and requirements established by third parties.  Bluegreen is currently taking steps to update its information technology platform, which has required, and is likely to continue to require, significant capital expenditures.  Older systems which have not yet been updated may increase the risk of operational inefficiencies, financial loss and non-compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements and Bluegreen may not be successful in updating such systems in the time frame or at the cost anticipated.  Further, as a result of the rapidly changing technological environment, systems which Bluegreen has put in place or expects to put in place in the near term may become outdated requiring new technology, and Bluegreen may not be able to replace those systems as quickly as its competition or within budgeted costs and time frames.  Further, Bluegreen may not achieve the benefits that may have been anticipated from any new technology or system.



BBX Capital and its subsidiaries are subject to environmental laws related to their real estate activities and the cost of compliance could adversely affect the Company’s businesses.



As current or previous owners or operators of real property, BBX Capital and its subsidiaries, including Bluegreen, may be liable under federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on, under or in the property. These laws often impose liability whether or not BBX Capital or its subsidiaries knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. The cost of investigating, remediating or removing such hazardous or toxic substances may be substantial.



---

 

In connection with the sale of BankAtlantic to BB&T during July 2012, BBX Capital acquired nonperforming loans and foreclosed real estate and our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected if these criticized assets are monetized below their current book values.



As a result of the BB&T transaction, BBX Capital maintains and manages a portfolio of foreclosed real estate and non-performing loans.  As a consequence, BBX Capital’s financial condition and results of operations will be dependent on its ability to successfully manage and monetize these legacy assets. Further, BBX Capital’s loan portfolio and real estate may not be easily salable in the event BBX Capital decides to liquidate an asset through a sale transaction.  If the legacy assets are not monetized at or near the current book values ascribed to them, or if these assets are liquidated for amounts less than book value, BBX Capital’s financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.  Because a majority of these legacy assets do not generate income on a regular basis, BBX Capital does not expect to generate significant revenue or income with respect to these assets until such time as an asset is monetized through repayments or it consummates transactions involving the sale, joint venture or development of the underlying real estate or investments.



Some of BBX Capital’s operations are through unconsolidated joint ventures with unaffiliated third parties and we may be adversely impacted by a joint venture partner’s failure to fulfill its obligations. 



By entering into joint ventures, BBX Capital may be successful in reducing the amount it invests in the ownership and development of real estate properties. However, joint venture partners may become financially unable or unwilling to fulfill their obligations under the joint venture agreements. Most joint ventures borrow money to help finance their activities, and although recourse on the loans is generally limited to the managing members, joint ventures and their properties, BBX Capital has in some cases and may in the future provide ongoing financial support or guarantees. If joint venture partners do not meet their obligations to the joint venture, BBX Capital may be required to make significant expenditures which may have an adverse effect on its operating results or financial condition. BBX Capital has in the past and may in the future have investments in a number of different joint ventures with the same or related developers which could increase the adverse effects of any failures by such developer to fulfil its obligations.



Investments by BBX Capital’s real estate division in real estate developments directly or through joint ventures expose us to market and economic risks inherent in the real estate construction and development industry.



The real estate construction and development industry is highly competitive and subject to numerous risks which in many cases are beyond management’s control.  The success of BBX Capital’s investments in real estate developments is dependent on many factors, including:





Any of these factors could give rise to delays in the start or completion of a project, or increase the cost of developing a project, or could result in reduced prices and values for BBX Capital’s developments, including developments underlying its joint venture investments.



---

 

A significant portion of BBX Capital’s loans and real estate assets are located in Florida and economic conditions in the Florida real estate market could adversely affect BBX Capital’s earnings and financial condition.



The legacy assets retained by BBX Capital in the BB&T Transaction and the real estate investments made by BBX Capital are primarily in Florida, and adverse changes to the Florida economy or the real estate market may negatively impact BBX Capital’s earnings and financial condition. BBX Capital’s real estate investment business, the primary source of repayment for loans and the real estate collateralizing loans and real estate acquired through foreclosure or settlements with borrowers and its investments in real estate joint ventures are primarily concentrated in Florida. As a result, BBX Capital is exposed to geographic risks of high unemployment rates, declines in the housing industry and declines in the real estate market in Florida. Adverse changes in laws and regulations in Florida would have a negative impact on BBX Capital’s revenues, financial condition and business. Declines in the Florida housing markets may negatively impact the credit performance of BBX Capital’s loans and result in significant asset impairments. Further, the State of Florida is subject to the risks of natural disasters such as tropical storms and hurricanes, which may disrupt BBX Capital’s operations, adversely impact the ability of its borrowers to timely repay their loans, adversely impact the value of any collateral securing loans and BBX Capital’s portfolio of real estate (both held-for-sale and held-for-investment), or otherwise have an adverse effect on BBX Capital’s results of operations. The severity and impact of tropical storms, hurricanes and other weather related events are unpredictable.



Renin sales are concentrated with two significant customers and there is significant competition in the industry.  



A significant amount of Renin’s sales are to big-box home centers.  These home centers in many instances have significant negotiating leverage with their vendors, including Renin, and are able to affect the prices of the products sold and the terms and conditions of conducting business with them.  These home centers may also reduce the number of vendors they purchase from or make significant changes in their volume of purchases. Although homebuilders, dealers and other retailers represent other channels of distribution for Renin’s products, the loss of a home center customer or reduced sales volume at any of these home centers would have a material adverse effect on Renin’s business. Further, Renin has substantial competition from overseas manufacturers of products similar to those sold by Renin.



A significant portion of Renin’s business relies on home improvement and new home construction activity, both of which are cyclical and outside of management’s control.



A significant portion of Renin’s business in Canada and the United States is dependent on the levels of home improvement activity, including spending on repair and remodeling projects, and new home construction activity. Macroeconomic conditions including consumer confidence levels, fluctuations in home prices, unemployment and underemployment levels, interest rates, regulatory initiatives, and the availability of home equity loans and mortgage financing  affect both  discretionary spending on home improvement projects as well as new home construction activity. Adverse changes in these factors or uncertainty regarding these macroeconomic conditions could result in a decline in spending on home improvement projects and a decline in demand for new home construction, both of which could adversely affect Renin’s results of operations.



The operating results of Renin and BBX Sweet Holdings would be negatively impacted if they experience increased commodity costs or a limited availability of commodities.



BBX Capital’s middle market operating businesses purchase various commodities to manufacture products, including steel, aluminum, glass and mirror in the case of Renin, and sugar and cocoa in the case of BBX Sweet Holdings. Fluctuations in the availability and prices of these commodities could increase the cost to manufacture products. Further, increases in energy costs could increase production costs as well as transportation costs, each of which could negatively affect their operating results.   Renin’s and BBX Sweet Holdings’ existing arrangements with customers, competitive considerations and the relative negotiating power and resistance of  home center customers and big-box retailers to price increases make it difficult to increase selling prices to absorb increased production costs. If Renin and BBX Sweet Holdings are not able to increase the prices of its products or achieve other cost savings or productivity improvements to offset any increased commodity and production costs, BBX Capital’s operating results could be negatively impacted. Many of the raw materials purchased by Renin and BBX Sweet Holdings are sourced from China, Mexico and other countries.  Changes in United States trade practices, or taxes levied on these imports, could significantly impact the results of these operating companies.





---

 

Market demand for chocolate and candy products could decline.



BBX Sweet Holdings and its acquired businesses operate in highly competitive markets and compete with larger companies that have greater resources.  The success of these businesses is impacted by many factors, including the following:





A decline in market demand for chocolate and candy products could negatively affect operating results.



BBX Sweet Holdings may experience product recalls or product liability claims.



Selling products for human consumption involves inherent legal and other risks, including product contamination, spoilage, product tampering, allergens, or other adulteration. BBX Sweet Holdings could decide or be required to destroy inventory, recall products or lose sales in connection with contamination, tampering, adulteration or other deficiencies.  These events could result in significant losses and may damage BBX Sweet Holdings’ reputation, and discourage consumers from buying products, or cause production and delivery disruptions which would adversely affect BBX Sweet Holdings’ financial condition and results of operations.  BBX Sweet Holdings may also incur losses if products cause injury, illness or death.  A significant product liability claim may adversely affect both reputation and profitability, even if the claim is unsuccessful.



Information technology failures and data security breaches could harm our business. 



The Company relies on information technology (IT) systems, including Internet sites, data hosting facilities and other hardware and platforms, some of which are hosted by third parties. These IT systems, like those of most companies, may be vulnerable to a variety of interruptions, including, but not limited to, natural disasters, telecommunications failures, hackers, and other security issues. Moreover, the Company’s computer systems, like those of most companies, may become subject to computer viruses or other malicious codes, and to cyber or phishing-attacks. Although administrative and technical controls have been implemented which attempt to minimize the risk of cyber incidents, computer intrusion efforts are becoming increasingly sophisticated, and any enhanced controls installed might be breached. If the IT systems cease to function properly, the Company could suffer interruptions in its operations. If the cyber-security is breached, unauthorized persons may gain access to the proprietary or confidential information of BBX Capital and its subsidiaries, including information about borrowers, employees or investments. This could require the Company to incur significant costs to comply with legally required protocols and to repair or restore the security of its systems.



Substantial sales of BBX Capital’s Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock could adversely affect the market prices of such securities.



Substantial sales of BBX Capital’s Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock, including sales of shares by controlling shareholders and management, could adversely affect the market prices of such securities. Management has in the past and may in the future enter into Rule 10b5-1 plans pursuant to which a significant number of shares are sold into the open market.



Alan B. Levan and John E. Abdo's control position may adversely affect the market price of BBX Capital's Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock.



Alan B. Levan, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of BBX Capital and John E. Abdo, the Vice Chairman of BBX Capital, collectively beneficially own shares of BBX Capital’s Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock representing approximately 76% of the general voting power of BBX Capital. In addition, each of Mr. Alan Levan and Mr. Abdo has been granted restricted securities of BBX Capital which are scheduled to vest over time. Further, Mr. Alan Levan and Mr. Abdo are parties to an agreement pursuant to which Mr. Alan Levan has

---

 

agreed to vote his shares of BBX Capital’s Class B Common Stock in favor of the election of Mr. Abdo to BBX Capital’s board of directors for so long as he is willing and able to serve as a director of BBX Capital, and Mr. Abdo has agreed to vote the shares of BBX Capital’s Class B Common Stock he owns in the same manner that Mr. Alan Levan votes his shares of BBX Capital’s Class B Common Stock. Mr. Abdo has also agreed, subject to certain exceptions, not to transfer certain of his shares of BBX Capital’s Class B Common Stock and to obtain the consent of Mr. Alan Levan prior to the conversion of certain of his shares of BBX Capital’s Class B Common Stock into shares of BBX Capital’s Class A Common Stock. Because BBX Capital’s Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock vote as a single class on most matters, Mr. Alan Levan and Mr. Abdo effectively have the voting power to elect the members of BBX Capital’s board of directors and to control the outcome of any other vote of BBX Capital’s shareholders, except in those limited circumstances where Florida law mandates that the holders of BBX Capital’s Class A Common Stock vote as a separate class. Mr. Alan Levan’s and Mr. Abdo’s control position may have an adverse effect on the market price of BBX Capital’s Class A Common Stock. In addition, their interests may conflict with the interests of BBX Capital’s other shareholders.



Provisions in BBX Capital's Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, as well as BBX Capital's shareholder rights plan, may make it difficult for a third party to acquire BBX Capital and could impact the price of BBX Capital's Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock.



BBX Capital's Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws contain provisions that could delay, defer or prevent a change of control of BBX Capital or its management. These provisions could make it more difficult for shareholders to elect directors and take other corporate actions. As a result, these provisions could limit the price that investors are willing to pay in the future for shares of BBX Capital's Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock. These provisions include:





In addition, BBX Capital’s rights agreement, which was adopted and is designed to preserve certain tax benefits available to BBX Capital, may have an anti-takeover effect because the rights agreement provides a deterrent to investors from acquiring a 5% or greater ownership interest in BBX Capital’s Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock.



Holders of BBX Capital’s Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock may not receive dividends in the amounts anticipated, when anticipated, or at all.



During each of June 2016, September 2016 and December 2016, BBX Capital’s board of directors declared a cash dividend of $0.005 per share on BBX Capital’s Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock. BBX Capital has indicated its intention to declare regular quarterly dividends of $0.005 per share on its Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock (an aggregate of $0.02 per share annually). However, future dividends are subject to approval and declaration by BBX Capital’s board of directors and, accordingly, BBX Capital may not make dividend payments in the future, whether in the amount anticipated, on a regular basis or as anticipated, or at all. The payment of dividends, if any, by BBX Capital will depend on many factors considered by its board of directors, including, without limitation, BBX Capital’s financial condition and results of operations, liquidity requirements, market opportunities, and contractual constraints. Further, over time, BBX Capital’s cash needs may change significantly from its current needs, which could affect whether BBX Capital pays dividends and the amount of any dividends it may pay in the future. The terms of BBX Capital’s indebtedness may also restrict it from paying cash dividends on its stock under certain circumstances. In addition, BBX Capital pays regular quarterly cash dividends of $187,500 with respect to its outstanding 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock. BBX Capital may not pay or set apart for payment any dividend or other distribution (other than a dividend or distribution payable solely in common stock) on its Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock until such time as all accrued and unpaid dividends on BBX Capital’s 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock have been or contemporaneously are declared or paid and a sum is set apart sufficient for payment of such accrued and unpaid dividends.

---

 



There are inherent uncertainties involved in estimates, judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Any changes in estimates, judgments and assumptions used could have a material adverse effect on BBX Capital’s financial position and operating results.



The consolidated financial statements included in the periodic reports BBX Capital files with the SEC, including this Annual Report on Form 10-K, are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP involves making estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets (including goodwill and other intangible assets), liabilities and related reserves, revenues, expenses and income. This includes estimates, judgments and assumptions for assessing the amortization/accretion of purchase accounting fair value differences and the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets pursuant to applicable accounting guidance. BBX Capital bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that BBX Capital believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are often not readily apparent from other sources. However, estimates, judgments and assumptions are subject to change in the future, and BBX Capital's estimates, judgments and assumptions may prove to be incorrect and BBX Capital's actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. If any estimates, judgments or assumptions change in the future, or BBX Capital’s actual results differ from BBX Capital's estimates or assumptions, BBX Capital may be required to record additional expenses or impairment charges, which would be recorded as a charge against its earnings and could have a material adverse impact on its financial condition and operating results.  The Company’s goodwill was tested for impairment on December 31, 2016 (annual testing date) and the goodwill assigned to one of BBX Sweet Holdings reporting units was determined to be impaired.  The goodwill assigned to another BBX Sweet Holdings reporting unit was determined not to be impaired.  If BBX Sweet Holdings’ reporting units do not meet expectations or if there is a downturn in the sugar and confectionery industry, the Company may recognize goodwill impairment charges in future periods.



Unexpected events, such as natural disasters, severe weather and terrorist activities may disrupt the Company’s operations and increase our costs.



The occurrence of one or more unexpected events, including tsunamis, hurricanes, earthquakes, floods and other forms of severe weather or terrorist activities in countries or regions in which our assets, suppliers or our operating businesses are located could adversely affect our operations and financial performance.



Natural disasters, acts or threats of war or terrorism, or other unexpected events could result in temporary or long-term disruption in the delivery or supply of necessary raw materials and component products from suppliers, which would disrupt production capabilities and likely increase our cost of doing business.



Legal proceedings and the impact of any finding of liability or damages could adversely impact BBX Capital and its financial condition and operating results.



BBX Capital and its subsidiaries have in the past and may in the future be subject to legal proceedings. The impact of any funding of liability or damages could adversely impact the Company’s financial condition and operating results and the costs of defending pending or threatened legal proceedings could be significant.



The loss of the services of key management and personnel could adversely affect the Company’s business.

 

The Company’s ability to successfully implement its business strategy will depend on the ability to attract and retain experienced and knowledgeable management and other professional staff.  If the Company is unable to retain and motivate its existing employees and efforts to retain and attract key management and other personnel are unsuccessful, the Company’s results of operations and financial condition may be materially and adversely impacted.









 

---

 







ITEM 1B.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS



None.









ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES



The principal executive offices of the Company are located at 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 800, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33301.  The office lease expiration date is June 30, 2021.  The Company has the right to renew the terms of the lease for two additional terms of five years commencing as of the expiration date. 



Bluegreen’s principal executive office is located in Boca Raton, Florida in 159,000 square feet of leased space. The office lease expiration date is December 31, 2018. At December 31, 2016, Bluegreen also maintained sales offices at or near 23 of its resorts as well as regional administrative offices in Orlando, Florida and Indianapolis, Indiana.  For a description of Bluegreen’s resort properties, that are part of the Bluegreen Vacation Club, please see “Item 1 Business —Products and Services – Vacation Club Resort Locations”.



Renin leases its executive offices located at 110 Walker Drive, Brampton, Ontario. The office lease expiration date is December 31, 2024.  Renin leases two manufacturing facilities in the United States and Canada which have lease expiration dates of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2024.



BBX Sweet Holdings leases manufacturing facilities in Utah and Florida and leases retail locations in Florida as follows:





BBX Sweet Holdings also owns a chocolate manufacturing facility located at 5190 Lake Worth Road, Greenacres, Florida.  The facility is comprised of a 4,000 square foot office and store front area and an 11,526 square foot manufacturing area. 



















---

 





ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 



In the ordinary course of business, BBX Capital and its subsidiaries are parties to lawsuits as plaintiff or defendant involving its operations and activities. Although BBX Capital and its subsidiaries believe that they have meritorious defenses in all current legal actions, the outcome of litigation and regulatory matters and timing of ultimate resolution are inherently difficult to predict and uncertain. Set forth below are descriptions of material pending legal proceedings.



In the ordinary course of business, Bluegreen becomes subject to claims or proceedings from time to time relating to the purchase, sale, marketing, or financing of VOIs or Bluegreen’s other business activities.  Bluegreen is also subject to certain matters relating to the Bluegreen Communities’ business, substantially all of the assets of which were sold by Bluegreen on May 4, 2012.  Additionally, from time to time, Bluegreen becomes involved in disputes with existing and former employees, vendors, taxing jurisdictions and various other parties. From time to time in the ordinary course of business, Bluegreen also receives individual consumer complaints, as well as complaints received through regulatory and consumer agencies, including Offices of State Attorneys General. Bluegreen takes these matters seriously and attempts to resolve any such issues as they arise. 



Securities and Exchange Commission v. BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. and Alan B. Levan, Case No. 12-60082-CV-SCOLA, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida



On January 18, 2012, the SEC brought an action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida against BCC and Alan B. Levan, BCC’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, alleging that they violated securities laws by not timely disclosing known adverse trends in BCC’s commercial real estate loans, selectively disclosing problem loans and engaging in improper accounting treatment of certain specific loans which may have resulted in a material understatement of its net loss in BCC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. Further, the complaint alleged that Mr. Alan B. Levan intentionally misled investors in related earnings calls. The Court denied summary judgment as to most issues, but granted the SEC’s motion for partial summary judgment that certain statements in one of Alan Levan’s answers on a July 25, 2007 investor conference call were false. 



On December 15, 2014, after a six-week trial, the jury found in favor of BCC and Alan B. Levan with respect to the disclosures made during an April 2007 earnings conference call and in BCC’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the 2007 first and second quarters, but found that they had engaged in an act of fraud or deceit toward shareholders or prospective investors by making materially false statements knowingly or with severe recklessness (1) with respect to three statements in the July 25, 2007 conference call referenced above, and (2) in their decision to sell certain loans in the fourth quarter of 2007 and failing to classify the loans as held-for sale in the 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.  The jury also found that Mr. Levan made or caused to be made false statements to the independent accountants regarding the held for sale issue. 



On September 24, 2015, the court entered a final judgment denying the SEC’s request for a permanent bar from Mr. Levan serving as an officer or director of any public company, but instead ordered Mr. Levan barred from serving as an officer or director of any public company for a period of two years commencing on December 23, 2015. The court also imposed monetary penalties against BCC in the amount of $4,550,000 and monetary penalties against Mr. Levan in the amount of $1,300,000.   



BCC and Mr. Alan Levan appealed the district court’s judgment to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.  On September 28, 2016, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the pretrial summary judgments and set aside the judgment of the district court. The reversal, which became final on January 31, 2017, terminated the financial penalties and set aside the two year officer and director bar imposed against Mr. Alan Levan.  Mr. Alan Levan was reappointed as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.  The court remanded the case for a new trial on the disclosure and accounting claims stripped of the summary judgments. The trial is scheduled to begin in March 2017.



BBX Capital received reimbursements of legal fees and costs from its insurance carrier of approximately $5.8 million in connection with this matter.  In February 2017, BBX Capital received an additional $5.1 million of reimbursements. The insurance carrier has communicated that it reserves all rights and defenses with respect to such reimbursed amounts.  



---

 

Shiva Stein, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, v. BBX Capital Corp., John E. Abdo, Norman H. Becker, Steven M. Coldren, Willis N. Holcombe, Jarett S. Levan, Anthony P. Segreto, Charlie C. Winningham, II, BFC Financial Corporation and BBX Merger Subsidiary LLC, Case No. CACE16014713, Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida.



On August 10, 2016, Shiva Stein filed a lawsuit against the Company, BBX Merger Sub, LLC, BCC and the members of BCC’s board of directors, which seeks to establish a class of BCC’s shareholders and challenges the Merger pursuant to which BCC merged with and into BBX Merger Sub.  The plaintiff asserts that the Merger consideration undervalues BCC and is unfair to BCC’s public shareholders, that the sales process was unfair and that BCC’s directors breached their fiduciary duties of care, loyalty and candor owed to the public shareholders of BCC because, among other reasons, they failed to take steps to maximize the value of BCC to its public shareholders and instead diverted consideration to themselves. The lawsuit also alleges that BBX Capital, as the controlling shareholder of BCC, breached its fiduciary duties of care, loyalty and candor owed to the public shareholders of BCC by utilizing confidential, non-public information to formulate the Merger consideration and not acting in the best interests of BCC’s public shareholders. In addition, the lawsuit includes a cause of action against BCC, the Company and BBX Merger Sub for aiding and abetting the alleged breaches of fiduciary duties. The lawsuit requested that the court grant an injunction blocking the proposed Merger or, if the proposed Merger is completed, rescind the transaction or award damages as determined by the court.  On September 15, 2016, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the amended complaint. On November 21, 2016, the Court issued an order granting the Motion to Dismiss with prejudice. On December 21, 2016, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal with the Fourth District Court of Appeals. The Company believes that the appeal is without merit and intends to continue vigorously defending the action.















ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES



Not Applicable.





---

 





PART II





ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES



The Company’s Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock have substantially identical terms, except as follows:





In addition to any other approval required by Florida law, the voting structure described in the first bullet point above may not be amended without the approval of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our Class B Common Stock, voting as a separate class.  Holders of our Class B Common Stock also have certain other special voting rights with respect to matters affecting our capital structure and the Class B Common Stock.





Market Information



Our Class A Common Stock is quoted on the OTCQX® Best Market under the ticker symbol “BBXT”.  Our Class B Common Stock is quoted on the OTCQX® Best Market under the ticker symbol “BBXTB”. 



Prior to February 3, 2017, our Class A and Class B Common Stock was quoted on the OTCQB market tier of the OTC Markets (“OTCQB”) under the ticker symbol name “BFCF” and “BFCFB”, respectively. 



On March 7, 2017, there were approximately 413 record holders of our Class A Common Stock and approximately 141 record holders of our Class B Common Stock.



The following table sets forth, for the indicated periods, the high and low trading prices for our Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock as quoted on the OTCQB.





---

 





Dividends



Prior to June 2016, the Company had never paid cash dividends on its common stock.  In June 2016, September 2016 and December 2016 the Company’s Board of Directors declared quarterly cash dividends on the Company’s Class A and Class B as follows:  









Future declaration and payment of cash dividends with respect to the Company’s Common Stock, if any, will be determined in light of the then-current financial condition of the Company and other factors deemed relevant by the board of directors.



See the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of “Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for a discussion regarding the ability of Bluegreen to pay dividends to the Company, as well as restrictions pertaining thereto.





Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities



On September 21, 2009, our board of directors approved a share repurchase program which authorizes the repurchase of up to 20,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock at an aggregate cost of up to $10 million.  The share repurchase program authorizes management, at its discretion, to repurchase shares from time to time subject to market conditions and other factors.  From April 1, 2016 through April 19, 2016, the Company repurchased 1.0 million shares of its Class A Common Stock under this repurchase program for approximately $3.0 million, which are the only shares that have been repurchased under the share repurchase program as of the date of the filing of this report on Form 10-K.  The share repurchase program does not have an expiration date and may be modified or discontinued at any time in the discretion of our Board of Directors.



---

 

On October 1, 2016 through October 5, 2016, a total of 247,405 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock previously owned by certain executive officers and an employee of the Company were surrendered to the Company by such individuals as payment in satisfaction of tax withholding obligations relating to the vesting on those dates of certain previously reported restricted stock awards granted to the executive officers.  On November 29, 2016, 2,611 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock was surrendered by a director of the Company as consideration for the exercise of stock options previously granted to the director.  Further information is set forth in the table below:









Equity Compensation Plan Information



The following table lists awards previously granted and outstanding, and securities authorized for issuance, under the Company’s equity compensation plans at December 31, 2016:









The Company assumed BCC equity compensation plans upon consummation of the Merger on December 15, 2016.  Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, awards outstanding under the BCC Equity Compensation Plan at December 15,

---

 

2016 continue to be outstanding and governed by the BBX Capital 2005 Restricted Stock and Option Plan, and the BBX Capital 2014 Stock Incentive Plan, except that such awards were converted into awards that are eligible to be settled in shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock resulting in the issuance of 5,090,354 restricted shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock and non-qualifying stock options to acquire 35,716 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock at December 15, 2016.  No further awards will be granted under the BCC equity compensation plans.





Shareholder Return Performance Graph



Set forth below is a graph comparing the cumulative total returns (assuming reinvestment of dividends) for the Company’s Class A Common Stock, the Standard and Poor’s 500 Stock Index and Standard and Poor’s Small-Cap Stock Index and assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2011.















The Company is not able to identify a group of peer companies or industry or line of business index which it believes is comparable to the Company and its current activities.  Accordingly, the Company selected the Standard and Poor’s Small-Cap Stock Index based on the Company’s market capitalization.



The performance graph should not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.



---

 





ITEM 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA



The following table sets forth selected historical consolidated financial data as of and for the periods indicated below.  The selected historical consolidated statements of operations for fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014 and the selected consolidated statements of financial conditions as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this report.  The selected historical consolidated statements of operations for fiscal years 2013 and 2012 and the selected consolidated statements of financial condition as of December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 set forth below are derived from our previously filed audited consolidated financial statements not included in this report and have been updated to conform to the current presentation.







---